WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

211

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Let's see...

  • I'm guessing octavian (could be crassus): The roman empire was one of the first major experiments in globalism. Complete with multiculturalism, tax cattle constantly being squeezed for more revenues and rewarded with occasional gibs, hyperinflation and eventually people being tied to their jobs by law to prevent them fleeing.

  • Charles I: Not sure of the relevance. Were the jews involved on one side or another of the English civil war?

  • Napoleon: Allegedly gave the finger to the bankers, but he also created one of the central jewish political institutions of europe, so there's that.

  • Lincoln: Depending on how you view it either fought against jewish slaver separatists or cemented federal hegemony over white americans. Personally I lean towards the latter: Even if jewish slavers were involved in the secession the principle of secession rights is more important than the politics behind any one secession. If problems arise they can always be solved by more secession.

  • The habsburgs: Speaks for itself. Established as the premier power in europe by a banker (Fugger the rich)

  • Alexander II: Allowed jews to enter russian public employment

  • Hitler: Either cucked for the rothschilds or challenged them (similar to napoleon). Jury's out.

  • Kennedy: May have stolen election, maye have been killed for challenging israeli domination of us politics, or the CIA over cuba, or the Federal reserve, or... hard to know. He pissed off a lot of people and kinda struck me as an unreliable similar to Trump.

  • Gadaffi: Wanted to establish a gold standard currency, allegedly, along with a lot of other alleged things. Personally I suspect he was killed because Italy were successfully paying him to stop africans flooding europe. The moment he died the floodgates opened and the migrant crisis began.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I don't think I ever finished it but the prevailing themes of the book are basically:

1) Fiat =/= bad. Fiat is no more imaginary than any other currency. Though it will be put down violently by the banking establishment (through the armies and actions of their debtor nations) because it subverts banker control.

2) Wars are fought often because of debt/banker influence. War is a mechanism for debt creation and thus banker control. Sell your country to the chosen to save your country from the chosen, goy!

3) Jews are usurious little shits that have sought total control of the world's currencies for millennia and will happily fund/profit off of all sides of a conflict without any qualms about morality or the human cost. They will bring war, subvert your political system and/or outright assassinate anyone that stands in their way to get what they want.

[–] 0 pt

Sounds about right. Might reat it at some point anyhow.