Personally, I feel that AI allows for the computational, time stealing portions of art to be lessened. In writing books, it helps flesh out my outlines, gives good advice for fixes, etc. I can crank out a whole book in a couple of weeks, now, where it used to take a year. In music, I can ask which chord progressions equate to which emotions. I can write song lyrics and it will help me fit it into the proper meter. I can do an album in a week. For visual art, I can now create stuff in a moment that I can, then, expand upon. The real danger is the wokeness being built into AI. Already, all AI platforms are racing to prevent people from making art that shows white people being victims of blacks. They are all racing to prevent any art that shows rabbis in their true colors. I think, for the stupids, it is a problem, but I also foresee some of the greatest art ever coming soon. The Wheel of Time is a notable piece of art, imo, because it fuses several theological threads into War & Peace. This was an epic undertaking and the outline was a little flawed. With AI, I don't have to spend time on outlining. I can start to fuse together all the Greek tragedies and have it set in my own hometown. This outline takes a half hour to produce. Then, when I have writer's block, it will help me push through with no wait time. Thus far, AI is a good time saving calculator. It crunches the data really well and explores multiple avenues and possibilities for your art super fast. THAT is its primary benefit, at the moment. To save you time. I don't see it being particularly creative, yet. It surpasses the average idiot, sure, but I have yet to see it be truly creative with new ideas. Right now, fusion seems to be the a good lane to use it for, things you'd never normally see. Azetc architecture, Irish style. Short story in the combined style of James Joyce and Ernest Hemingway. The latest Weeknd song, but in country/blues.