WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

680

I love how random autists break this multi billion dollar machine to speak the truth.

I love how random autists break this multi billion dollar machine to speak the truth.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

I don't think you realize: even if microsoft open-sourced chatgpt, and provided all model binaries, you wouldn't be able to run it.

You would need to spin it up on a cloud platform or massive data server farm in order to have the required terabytes (yes, terabytes) of RAM and cores required to actually execute the model I/O.

[–] 1 pt

Didn't realize it was that massive.

[–] 2 pts

The dataset chatgpt's models were trained on is unbelievably massive. it' microsoft so think about ever single email conversaion from outlook, every public/private github repo, all public data (wikipedia, reddit, 4chan, twitter, facebook, etc. etc.) and all their other platforms, spanning decades.

We're talking trillions to quadrillions of individual conversations between billions of people over decades. Chatgpt is the appearance of intelligence. In reality all it is doing is regurgitating conversations it has already seen.

[–] 1 pt

Well shit, I knew I hated technology for a reason. Your answer pretty much sums up why. I often wish I could just go back and live in the early 1900s. Just enough tech to make life convenient, and more importantly no niggers.

[–] 1 pt

Yeah, these sorts of things are massively parallel and designed to run on specialized (GPU) hardware. I work for a law firm (AMLAW 100) and was researching doing our own AI based audio recognition, and even just for that it isn't feasible. It would mean spinning up multiple servers with specialized CUDA hardware and THEN training the AI constantly. Just not worth it when there are closed caption services in the cloud that will do the same thing and sign our NDAs.