WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

368
https://nitter.poast.org/theblaze/status/1977827078532899213

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Explain to me, using your words, why you dislike brutalism.

[–] 2 pts

It is offensive to the eye. Intentionally so. Perhaps intended to be reminiscent of WWII concrete bunkers, and fortifications. Very little natural light will get in. Purposely intended to blight the surrounding area, with no grace, or classical style. Oddly, if ugly is to useless, it descibes perfectly the literal nigger faggot that Soros had installed in the White house. It should surprise no one that this will no doubt be celebrated by the 《media.》

[–] 1 pt

Would you buy a sex toy shaped like that?

[–] 1 pt

Would you buy a sex toy shaped like that?

Are you implying that you buy building-shaped sex toys, but only from better architectural schools?

[–] 2 pts

'smoother architectural schools'

[–] 1 pt

It's ugly, evil looking, incomplete, lazy. I don't know how it can even be called architecture, it's like when someone uncreative plays Minecraft and their house is just a cobblestone cube.