> A multicultural state carries in it's genesis the seeds of eventual national destruction, which is why its vitally important that it must be opposed, avoided and exposed. I think you are doing more harm than good when you call it a social term like "multicultural" [misdirecting the whole theme of your post]: all those "multicultural" states you are referring to are civilizations brought about through the spread of the innate genetic advantage and creation/domination by racially White/Western-European/Aryan people. Neither Greece nor Spain were remotely as olive prior to Persians and Moors in the era of the Ancient Greeks [just jook a the busts and sculpures--that is purely "nordic" blood]: this is just the noticeable border of a process that has been going on ages [the tide is comming in after going out]. Achilles was blonde; the Trojans were not differentiated from the Greeks. Troy was in modern day Turkey. White blood spread farther and wider, and influenced more than (((they))) want to admit--and if you so much as question (((their))) re-written history you are branded racist (it is beyond exploration to look into). Dilution of the pedigree KILLS. You cave to jewish semantics and pass on your perception-sickening virus to others, consciously or unconsciously condoning the social-only, no-race, idea. ______ There is something in the cohesion and social operation beyond mere intelligence in collections of white individuals that is essential to Good civilization. Some races have this more than others, and it is something socially adapted into our genetics. It is retarded to claim there is no difference in genetic groups of bipeds, but there is in everything else. It is my adamant "opinion" that there is more than simple *social construction* involved in the evolution of Civilization.