The strike was designed as a one-time action (overly complicated and expensive), and if the retaliation avoids direct attacks on US personnel, the strike removed the bomb argument without escalating the situation.
The media, neocons and Bibi have two options: they can declare that the strike was successful (wich puts an end to the bomb argument), or admit that blitzkrieg and shock-and-awe don't work (which means boots on the ground, something Trump can easily block because a huge majority is against it).
The strike was designed as a one-time action (overly complicated and expensive), and if the retaliation avoids direct attacks on US personnel, the strike removed the bomb argument without escalating the situation.
The media, neocons and Bibi have two options: they can declare that the strike was successful (wich puts an end to the bomb argument), or admit that blitzkrieg and shock-and-awe don't work (which means boots on the ground, something Trump can easily block because a huge majority is against it).
(post is archived)