Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

557

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

Meanwhile China will not hesitate to send it's fishing boats and catch all the fish from that same area of Japanese/international waters.

[–] • 3 pts

An export it to places like the United States for consumption. Jk, China doesn't care who eats it, even if it's their own people.

[–] • 2 pts

And Labelled 'sustainable Ocean fresh'

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

Same thing around Australia....

[–] • 1 pt

And Nz too - the driftnetting/ sea floor trawling bug-fckers are everywhere.

[–] • 1 pt

There is no cause for alarm, citizen.

[–] • 0 pt

Question - how was this radioactive water treated ?/. How do you 'correct' unsafe radioactive water into 'safe wastewater'. If it's that safe why dont they use it for agriculture or industrial purposes or bottle it for their citizens ??.

[–] • 0 pt

The short version of my vague recollection of the explanation from a video years ago about this issue is that most of the radioactive particles involved have a very short half life and will mostly be gone by now.

Also dilution is the solution to pollution.

[–] • 1 pt

Oh ok, yea totes agree dilution is generally the best answer and why it's the go to for mitigating effects of most enviromental poisons and toxins, then allow time for nature to correct an equilibrium.

I kinda remember years ago - Fukushima had acres of hundreds/ thousands of thick bladders fill of 'radioactive water' that was leaking into the ground and they were worried at that time of the potential negative effects once it got into the groundwater or leached out to sea and were exploring new ways to mitigate radioactive isotopes - guess they didnt find any other than the standardized PPM .

[–] • 0 pt

Dilution is the solution to pollution.