... I quite literally experience gravity every moment of my life, so do you. Just because you don't understand what that means is irrelevant to gravity being a thing. Mere existence is proven by gravity. We may explain it completely wrong, it may be due to subatomic niggers holding everything down because they're collectively trying to steel everything. I didn't get that retarded in my last reply and went with;
What's not "proven" about it is how we mathematically model it, how we think it works.
Which is far more easily understood and correct. Gravity exists, you're well poisoning, what you're doing is retarded and wrong. Gravity is not a theory, how humans (we) think we know it is the theory, how we explain it mathematically is a theory, how we test it is theoretical. Me sitting in my chair, not floating in mid air or into space is not a theory but it is gravity.
Learn how to contextualize what's written. Nothing I've said as a fact is incorrect or a theory.
Nothing I've said as a fact is incorrect or a theory.
See
I quite literally experience gravity every moment of my life
What you experience is what we refer to as gravity. That is not the same as the theory of gravity being correct.
It could be buoyancy, or it could be gravity. The latter of the two is not effectively modelable, and thus it remains a "theory" as the "theory" is an attempt to explain what is assumed to be the "fact of gravity"
It could just as easily be buoyancy. Buoyancy fits and IS effectively modelable. It could be gravity. You don't know. I don't know.
What you experience is what we refer to as gravity. That is not the same as the theory of gravity being correct.
Do you experience heat when you place your hand on a turned on, hot stove? Yes you do. You don't experience the theory of heat, which guess what - is as much a theory as gravity as it's explained by fundamental theories of energy. So no, you're being a redditor, a kike and you want to look smart but are doing nothing of the sort.
What you sound like is the kikes who push; No One Can Explain Why Planes Stay in the Air (archive.md) Except we can, as it's known however as you would say and is correct it is all simply a thory. It's well known and understood and at this point as escaped "theory" as it's repeatable at will.
Gravity is real, how we model it is a theory but gravity is real. Just like heat is real and how we model it is theoretical. Just like light is real and how we model it is theoretical, until we find something we can't explain - slit / double slit experiment - but that' doesn't mean light is just a theory it just means how we understand it incomplete.
Stop being intellectually dishonest.
What you experience is what we refer to as gravity.
Stop being a (((pedant))), especially stop being a (((pedant))) when you're wrong.
What you experience is what we refer to as gravity.
What we call 'a thing' isn't a theory either. That's what it is because that's what language means, why language matters, and how it's used. Stop conflating language with this conversation.
It could just as easily be buoyancy
Put a bowling ball in a vacuum chamber and see if it floats.
It won't, but your theory is testable.
(post is archived)