What you experience is what we refer to as gravity. That is not the same as the theory of gravity being correct.

Do you experience heat when you place your hand on a turned on, hot stove? Yes you do. You don't experience the theory of heat, which guess what - is as much a theory as gravity as it's explained by fundamental theories of energy. So no, you're being a redditor, a kike and you want to look smart but are doing nothing of the sort.

What you sound like is the kikes who push; No One Can Explain Why Planes Stay in the Air (archive.md) Except we can, as it's known however as you would say and is correct it is all simply a thory. It's well known and understood and at this point as escaped "theory" as it's repeatable at will.

Gravity is real, how we model it is a theory but gravity is real. Just like heat is real and how we model it is theoretical. Just like light is real and how we model it is theoretical, until we find something we can't explain - slit / double slit experiment - but that' doesn't mean light is just a theory it just means how we understand it incomplete.

Stop being intellectually dishonest.

What you experience is what we refer to as gravity.

Stop being a (((pedant))), especially stop being a (((pedant))) when you're wrong.

What you experience is what we refer to as gravity.

What we call 'a thing' isn't a theory either. That's what it is because that's what language means, why language matters, and how it's used. Stop conflating language with this conversation.

It could just as easily be buoyancy

Put a bowling ball in a vacuum chamber and see if it floats.

It won't, but your theory is testable.