But if it's based on his-story books, it's just another fictitious prose narrative
But if it's based on his-story books, it's just another fictitious prose narrative
Everybody who points out that Sir Kissinger was a British spy, used for the silent takeover of the US by the British intelligence community (together with the Dulles brothers), is nearer at the reality than most of the official history books.
Everybody who points out that Sir Kissinger was a British spy, used for the silent takeover of the US by the British intelligence community (together with the Dulles brothers), is nearer at the reality than most of the official history books.
(post is archived)