WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

172

Prince Reza Pahlavi (The son of the last Shah)

I asked AI about this faggot:


Based on recent statements and actions, here are Reza Pahlavi's positions on these topics:

On Jews and Israel: He has spoken at the Simon Wiesenthal Center's Museum of Tolerance about his solidarity Jewish Journal (jewishjournal_com) with the Jewish people, and in April 2023 he visited Israel where he prayed at the Western Wall "for the day when the good people of Iran and Israel can renew our historic friendship," meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Herzog The Forward (forward.com) . He has called for normalizing relations through what he dubbed the "Cyrus Accords," and commented that "the only two countries on this planet that can claim to have a biblical relationship" are "Iran and Israel" The Forward (forward.com) .

On Iran's nuclear weapons: He harshly criticized the Iran nuclear deal and urged President Trump to exercise "maximum pressure" on the regime Encyclopedia Britannica (britannica.com) . He supported the Israeli and U.S. strikes in June 2025 that mainly hit Iran's nuclear facilities CBC News (cbc.ca) , and he stated "this regime, in its DNA, is simply incompatible with the free world" and called for crackdowns on its nuclear program The Jerusalem Post (jpost_com) .

The political cost: His stance during the Iran-Israel war, particularly presenting Israeli attacks as "an opportunity," drew strong criticism from other Iranian opposition figures including political prisoners in Iran, who labeled him a "traitor," with reports suggesting he "may have squandered the little support he once had" Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org) .

His positions reflect a vision of Iran aligned with Western powers and Israel, which creates distance between him and many Iranians who oppose the current regime.

[Prince Reza Pahlavi (The son of the last Shah)](https://poal.co/static/images/929b931303676262.jpg) I asked AI about this faggot: --- Based on recent statements and actions, here are Reza Pahlavi's positions on these topics: **On Jews and Israel:** He has spoken at the Simon Wiesenthal Center's Museum of Tolerance about his solidarity [Jewish Journal](https://jewishjournal_com/cover_story/368406/a-prince-among-men/) with the Jewish people, and in April 2023 he visited Israel where he prayed at the Western Wall "for the day when the good people of Iran and Israel can renew our historic friendship," meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Herzog [The Forward](https://forward.com/news/796129/why-protests-in-iran-seem-surprisingly-pro-israel/) . He has called for normalizing relations through what he dubbed the "Cyrus Accords," and commented that "the only two countries on this planet that can claim to have a biblical relationship" are "Iran and Israel" [The Forward](https://forward.com/news/796129/why-protests-in-iran-seem-surprisingly-pro-israel/) . **On Iran's nuclear weapons:** He harshly criticized the Iran nuclear deal and urged President Trump to exercise "maximum pressure" on the regime [Encyclopedia Britannica](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Reza-Pahlavi) . He supported the Israeli and U.S. strikes in June 2025 that mainly hit Iran's nuclear facilities [CBC News](https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/iran-pahlavi-profile-9.7041837) , and he stated "this regime, in its DNA, is simply incompatible with the free world" and called for crackdowns on its nuclear program [The Jerusalem Post](https://www.jpost_com/opinion/article-858801) . **The political cost:** His stance during the Iran-Israel war, particularly presenting Israeli attacks as "an opportunity," drew strong criticism from other Iranian opposition figures including political prisoners in Iran, who labeled him a "traitor," with reports suggesting he "may have squandered the little support he once had" [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reza_Pahlavi,_Crown_Prince_of_Iran) . His positions reflect a vision of Iran aligned with Western powers and Israel, which creates distance between him and many Iranians who oppose the current regime.
[–] 1 pt (edited )

Aryamehr (lit.'Light of the Aryans') introduced the White Revolution

Based.

Was he installed as puppet but he grew too powerful and the kikes lost control over him? Kikes could not have liked being called out and these:

nationalization of Iran's natural resources end foreign powers' intervention in the country

Makes sense why he was allowed to be overthrown. In the 1979 revolution there were two sides opposing monarchy (according to my recollection) communists and islamists... let me now guess wildly: the jews were gambling on the communists who (wild guess) probably were pro-jewish or pro-israel... Hm no... after searching seems the kikes were still liking the shah til his reign's end:

https://www.972mag.com/israel-shah-iran-dictatorship/

Israel did not want to lose its stronghold in Iran under any circumstance. If the Shah was to be deposed, Israel hoped that a military regime would take his place. In a telegram from December 30, 1978, Director of the Middle East Department at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Yael Vered writes that the best option for the State of Israel is “extreme toughness by the army and the establishment of a military regime and a real military government. Whether initiated by the army in the form of a military coup or with the Shah through tacit consent on his part.”

AI slop:

Israel didn't turn away from the Shah—quite the opposite. Until the regime's last moments, Israel hoped that a military coup woul +972 Magazine (972mag.com) d save its relationship with Iran. Gen. Yitzhak Segev, Israel's military attaché from 1977 to 1979, described the cooperation as "tremendous," noting that "every Iranian general visited Israel and we visited them." The Times of Israel (timesofisrael_com) They were actively collaborating on Project Flower, a joint Iranian-Israeli attempt to develop a new missile from 1977–79 Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org) right until the end.