Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

608

Anyone else see it as obvious that is the a "gentlemen's" war being played out?

Russia still doesn't even have a stated purpose. The republicans / democrats are clearly only involved with it so they can get payouts. So why is Russia involved with it? Are they also getting payouts?

Both Russia and the West clearly will not tolerate the war spilling over into their actual countries. Which means both sides have the power to make this into a bigger thing but both choose not to for a reason. We know the West's reason. Payouts. Is Russia also getting those payouts?

Anyone else see it as obvious that is the a "gentlemen's" war being played out? Russia still doesn't even have a stated purpose. The republicans / democrats are clearly only involved with it so they can get payouts. So why is Russia involved with it? Are they also getting payouts? Both Russia and the West clearly will not tolerate the war spilling over into their actual countries. Which means both sides have the power to make this into a bigger thing but both choose not to for a reason. We know the West's reason. Payouts. Is Russia also getting those payouts?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (15).
[–] • 0 pt

nope

why ?

simple, it would have been way simpler and easier for elites to do nothing, to have WEF plan rumbling

also, it is mostly ukrainans genocide, russians are way more careful with their men (see how they NOT stormed mariupol and retreated instead of having militarymen killed)

also

yes, china is using WEF playbook, but THEY are in control of the nation, not WEF (as opposed to USA) so .....

the battle is not settled, yet

[–] • 0 pt

I'm not sure, but my opinion is not set in stone. Situation is still developing as you said.

One thing I'm 100% sure of is that Putin and Zelensky would be equally happy to see all "Nazis" like us on Poal put against the wall and shot.

[–] • 1 pt

we really need to agree on a common definition of "nazi"

my definition is possibly NOT the original definition of national socialist, but the result of describing them as the ones that waged war trough all europe. Yes, I understand that germany was "thrown" into war by the jew, but still, the stigma is still there

so, we really need a different name, what we aim is just to be left to live our life in peace, but clearly the jew do not like this and throw endless stream of attacks to a peaceful society.

so, a name could be pamir a mix of pace (italian for peace) and mir (world, in russian, in latin-1 chars)

I would like to be a pamir, yes, defending my people

[–] • 1 pt

It might be necessary since the masses have already been programmed.

Still, lots of people are realizing the truth and turning toward National Socialism and Hitler.

Pamir would be good to draw in those intimidated by "Nazis", or those who could end up getting canceled if they connected directly with them.

To draw in those that are just angry and want to see this entire (((NWO/Globalism))) fall so they can go back to having normal lives, and I think kikes gave us an good working point for such movement: https://archive.org/details/EuropeWillNotSurvive

"Europe will not be the monolithic society they once were" - we need something that will tell them "we will be and we are coming back, bitch!"