there is no “climate emergency,” the goal of Net-Zero by 2050 is “delusional,” neither warranted, feasible, nor politically possible and would be so costly it would “drive a 33 percent average reduction in all government spending on health, housing, education, social welfare, police, climate adaptation, defense, social justice, etc.”
And it would be completely worthless. These articles seldom mention this important point. Not only would it cost a vast amount of money, but that money would accomplish nothing of value.
>there is no “climate emergency,” the goal of Net-Zero by 2050 is “delusional,” neither warranted, feasible, nor politically possible and would be so costly it would “drive a 33 percent average reduction in all government spending on health, housing, education, social welfare, police, climate adaptation, defense, social justice, etc.”
And it would be completely worthless. These articles seldom mention this important point. Not only would it cost a vast amount of money, but that money would accomplish nothing of value.
(post is archived)