President Conte, there is a dangerous flaw in the apparently restrictive measures just launched by the government for the Coronavirus emergency. A stretch mark that creates the basis for a sensational and irrational spread of the infection outside the areas most at risk. Forgive us for moving from legulei: this is a rule, first simply enunciated by introducing the disconcerting self-certification for those who move from risk areas, and then better detailed in the Civil Protection ordinance that interprets the alleged restriction. It reads as follows: "The provisions do not prohibit natural persons from traveling throughout the country for work, necessity or health reasons, as well as carrying out the consequent activities". A shiver caught us after reading the text. "Need". But who establishes such a fleeting concept? At least they had written cause of force majeure. But anyway. Then outrage ensued. Because, with a similar formulation, the number of those who can roam ad libitum even in those areas with percentages of infected people still not alarming and therefore for this reason to be preserved widens with a very large mesh. We would understand the license to circulate for those who can demonstrate irrefutable and proven work needs, certified by companies: cases so rare that they can be monitored, these yes, easily by the authorities. We obviously understand commuting within non-risk areas within a radius of kilometers if alternative solutions such as teleworking or the like cannot be adopted. But all the rest, with the Russian roulette of self-certified permits, just not. The risk of exposing entire communities, national public health, to the potential contagion - just scroll through any table with the exponential growth of the test positive - would be very high. And therefore intolerable. What are the penalties provided for? The repressive efficacy of those hypothesized is minimal. Prison is threatened, but it is Platonic because it risks being reduced to a purely nominal penalty, since it is a criminal offense. This is not the dissuasive way for those who transgress. We must ensure a real tightening in the name of public health, not palliatives. In short, block everything. But really stop. but it is platonic because it risks being reduced to a purely nominal penalty in the case of a criminal offense. This is not the dissuasive way for those who transgress. We must ensure a real tightening in the name of public health, not palliatives. In short, block everything. But really stop. but it is platonic because it risks being reduced to a purely nominal penalty in the case of a criminal offense. This is not the dissuasive way for those who transgress. We must ensure a real tightening in the name of public health, not palliatives. In short, block everything. But really stop. President Conte, but how could the government introduce such a gap in those rules which, on the contrary, should have been restrictive to arm the population? There is only one explanation which is then a certainty: Palazzo Chigi has obviously succumbed to pressure from one or more Regions among those that had the red areas first. A rise of shields daughter of the repeated cases in which the Regions are in opposition to the central authority. A disastrous sight that must lead us, beyond the epidemic case, to review the powers of these local authorities not only in health matters. We cannot helplessly witness a dictatorship of the Regions that exalt territorial particularism to satisfy the demagogic impulses of part of their rulers. We cannot leave the country in the hands of speculators who think with a short, profiting thought only of sinister shop interests. Until proven otherwise, we have a state that can and must ask all citizens to respect the law, at any latitude. A nice interview with Alcide De Gasperi published on 7 July 1952 comes to our rescue. "The strong state - explained the then Prime Minister - does not mean reactionary or arbitrary but the one where the law is respected and enforced. The law that is the Constitution and all the other laws that are needed to apply it. And its strength is not physical but moral ». A nice interview with Alcide De Gasperi published on 7 July 1952 comes to our rescue. "The strong state - explained the then Prime Minister - does not mean reactionary or arbitrary but the one where the law is respected and enforced. The law that is the Constitution and all the other laws that are needed to apply it. And its strength is not physical but moral ». A nice interview with Alcide De Gasperi published on 7 July 1952 comes to our rescue. "The strong state - explained the then Prime Minister - does not mean reactionary or arbitrary but the one where the law is respected and enforced. The law that is the Constitution and all the other laws that are needed to apply it. And its strength is not physical but moral ». So far De Gasperi, just to refresh the civil memory that is now dormant. But the point is much more concrete, President Conte. The government cannot enact alleged draconian laws and then rely on self-responsibility, a factor we know in Italy has always been at risk, just to put it mildly. It is the hour of responsibility, the one in which men and institutions measure themselves. He cannot indulge the drift of Manzonian cries, knowing then the fate that the plague and plague victims had in Milan four centuries ago. In short, the risk is to bring back from the door what has come out of the window. All of us citizens are bound to obey the state without desertions. Who legitimately leveraging on a healthy fear of the epidemic by the population must act without derogations and exceptions. The state does the state and does not abdicate its authority. In short, let the government start and act. Show that you can exercise this control and restore the healthy relationship in which the Regions are and must be subordinate. Take a hit and comfort a worried country that is waiting to be protected and protected. It has only one way to get out of it, quick and necessary: ​​correct the decrees that have just been launched, by buffering the flaw and not exposing the defenseless population to danger. There is no other way out. And it's already late, very late. https://www.ilmessaggero.it/editoriali/virman_cusenza/editoriali_virman_cusenza-5101220.html