No, Iran Won’t Have a Nuclear Bomb ‘in a Matter of Months’. But if we keep pushing we may not be able to assess their capabilities either way. Here's why. | Poal: Say what you want.

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

528

•

No, Iran Won’t Have a Nuclear Bomb ‘in a Matter of Months’. But if we keep pushing we may not be able to assess their capabilities either way. Here's why. (www.theamericanconservative.com)

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Iran likely has several already, which is why they haven't been invaded.

link

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

https://brassballs.blog/home/iran-underground-missile-cities-qasem-soleimani-quds-force-general-silos-ballistic-jafari-nuclear-deal-joint-cooperation-plan-action-base-under-mountain-france-great-britain-russia-france-86-amendments

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

(edited )

1 nuclear warhead?! jeez. They might have a nuclear warhead?!

https://archive.org/details/Sampson_Option/mode/2up

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option

israel has a plan to nuke america alone as well as the rest of the world.

talking to someone else - side note: - yep england to as well would get nuked (your mi9 guy or whoever that is - think it's actually an actor from the U.K. not sure). rhetorical question, but I answered it truthfully.

link