Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

973

"Doctor, what real risk does a very small number of conscientious objectors pose to a health system where 99 per cent of the other staff are vaccinated?" Mr Prince asked. "The vaccination of healthcare staff reduces the risk of a person acquiring infection and therefore passing it on," Dr Chant replied

He should have then went on to ask "it's been proven that by taking this therapeutic it neither stops the transmission or spread of covid and only reduces the symptoms. What good reason if any is the point of injecting this experimental thereputic?"

>"Doctor, what real risk does a very small number of conscientious objectors pose to a health system where 99 per cent of the other staff are vaccinated?" Mr Prince asked. "The vaccination of healthcare staff reduces the risk of a person acquiring infection and therefore passing it on," Dr Chant replied He should have then went on to ask "it's been proven that by taking this therapeutic it neither stops the transmission or spread of covid and only reduces the symptoms. What good reason if any is the point of injecting this experimental thereputic?"

(post is archived)

[–] • 0 pt

A NSW paramedic finds COVID-19 vaccine mandates "morally repugnant" due to his Roman Catholic faith and political conservatism, a Sydney court has heard

Those reasons are cucked deflections from the only truly defensible position. Stand on bodily autonomy alone. All other "exemptions" will inevitably be end-run.