WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

461

The article is CIA propaganda. No substance there but should they at least have some references for their bullshit stats?

The article is CIA propaganda. No substance there but should they at least have some references for their bullshit stats?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

They are just cooking those books again. They are probably taking the most favorable +- number and claiming that's reality. Take whatever they claim the +- number is and that is probably closer to reality. It will still be high, depending on your area.