The Jews who claim they are Jews are in fact not Jews. The real Jews died out a long ass time ago. The Jews that make claim to Israel are askenazi and khazararin. Shephardic Jews are Arabs. So actually that claim is correct.
Why would Europeans have a claim to the region?
No. Jews are not the Israelites. Ashkenazi are in fact Turkish European with some semetic admixture to support their position. From intermarriage.
Jews isn't even biblical. It didn't enter the lexicon until somewhere around 1000 and didn't enter the kjv until after 1611. Jew is a more recent word and had nothing to do with the bible aside from there fact they are attempting to conflate it with Judean.
The people we call Europeans today spanned the globe and have claim to most every land. Thats the significance of the swastikas. Found everywhere pre flood and many paces post flood.
Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are [Israelites], and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
Jews are edomites and canaanite. They are the pharisees. They are not the biblical Israelites. Jesus also calls them out for falsely claiming to be the Israelites. "Jew" isn't even biblical.
https://www.livescience.com/9578-common-ancestor-blue-eyes.html
For more information and a deeper dive:
https://poal.co/c/0d962bc7-75a1-4242-b48e-ad3438ebc7bb#cmnts
So yes, everything I told you is correct. The video starts out with confirmed lies.
I’ll look over this later. But my understanding is that khazars are from Turkish ancestry , and the askenazi are from France/Germany somewhere...
I’d have to get on my computer to throughly re-research this topic as I have a shit ton of sources.
Also, where does the Jew as Neanderthal and Europeans as cro magnon arguement come from? I buy into the “40,000 year old blood feud argument”
Btw, as the pharisees disappeared they recorded their oral traditions. Bible also mentions this which is confirmed by Jews today. We now call these people talmudic jews. The disappearance of the pharisees and the appearance of talmudic Jews only spans roughly 150 years.
khazars
The khazars are the ashkenazi. They converted en mass to avoid conflict between Christians and muslims. They've gamed everyone ever since.
Also, where does the Jew as Neanderthal and Europeans as cro magnon arguement come from? I buy into the “40,000 year old blood feud argument”
I've read some in this but don't feel I have an authoritative position on it. So I'll refrain from comment.
One of the things which confuses people is that the modern populations looked very different even 2000 years ago.
For example, Egypt was once white. The people there today are immigrants and what's left of mixed breeding. Just like what's now pushed everywhere against whites today. This is why so many mummies have red hair and blue eyes. This is how jesus could hide amongst the population.
Blacks and Jews are distinctly represented in the glyphs. The paints have significantly darkened over time. We're wrongly told they were dark. The pigments were used well into European art for white skin. Jews are represented with large noses. Blacks with black and were usually slaves.
By whites, I'm really talking about the proto-Europeans who are more commonly referred to as aryans and scythians. Enter the significance of the swastika. More info in links provided. Which gives us caucasian, caucasoid, and so on, from the caucuses at the end of the flood.
(post is archived)