WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

904

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

It doesn't complicate anything. But... jews can play mental gymnastics with it.

[–] 1 pt

Annalee Newitz , I'll just assume she's a kike...

[–] 1 pt (edited )

You could also assume so by the content of the article. "Sometimes women hunted too." No fucking shit. "Pregnant or lactating women didn't usually hunt." No fucking shit. "Hunting vs gathering was probably about efficient division of labor." No fucking shit.

But rather than use that to show that the family unit is about efficient survival and not oppression, let's use it to re-evaluate gender roles and play more feminist power and privilege games.

[–] 2 pts

>But rather than use that to show that the family unit is about efficient survival and not oppression, let's use it to re-evaluate gender roles and play more feminist power and privilege games.

The re-write history modis operundi is in the kike kommandments

[–] 0 pt

Because of tribal war or disease the men were likely killed off, leaving women to do men's work. It's was a matter of survival and not gender challenge.

Fact is, hunting is a very physical activity. Especially if the game is large. Carrying hundreds of pounds of meat back to camp, after walking, running, and hunting is very physically demanding. Not to mention, if you take too long you can attract large predators.

Not only are women in general not up to it, it becomes near impossible with children. Which means if you want big game meat, it's almost always going to come from men, unless there are no men available. Because any other division of labor is retarded and physically disadvantageous to women.