The way I understand it is, that some iranian shitskin got into a dispute with a syrian shitskin. The syrian shitskin was thrown out, and came back with reinforcements. Then team syria attacked the iranian, and some shithead who's working for the church tried to intervene, and was stabbed as a result.

Let me ask the following questions:

• What was the iranian shitskin doing in the church?
• what was the syrian doing inside the church?

If you think about those facts, it becomes clear, that they're not talking about some nice 卐-mas party visited by decent white folks, but about some asylum racket run by the church. So that's pretentious reporting. A few shitskins did nothing wrong by trying to make the world whiter by killing each other, and some church-employee tried to intervene, and was punished for it, as is good and decent.

Actually, the article should praise the shitskins for their decency. As you may be aware, new-years eve is coming, and in germany it became a tradition to have german women raped by shitskins during the new-years-eve-festivities. In comparison, shitskins making the world whiter by killing each other, or making the world into a more decent place by killing employees of some asylum-racket, is a good thing.

The attackers' motives will clearly remain unclear and they'll be sent to resort clinics to recover from the their traumatic experience at taxpayer expense, of course.