WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Authorities in Uganda have charged 67 people with “public nuisance”

Love it.

I just wish I could decide who was a public nuisance and have them arrested.

Brave Uganda says no to gay porn and trans kids!

MUGA!

[–] 1 pt

I just can't get over how they classify gays as a public nuisance. It's epic.

It's a matter of perspective, always

From my POV, gays, are potentially more of a sanitary threat than heterosexuals, because aids and shit, because poligamy also, and I suspect that religions who ban gays, understood just that

Primary concern is survival of the group, for such old books, it's not just novels for the sake of it

Also, gays are factually bugged, sexually bugged for one reason or another. Society would be made entirely of gays it would vanish in about 1 generation, which isn't the case with heterosexual. And I believe religions referred above also took note of that fact. You can't use homos as social role models for men, it's not a great idea for obvious reasons.

And yeah they call to kill them, in old testament for instance

Maybe because they also understood that they can't really change, they are bugged their nature is different now, sort of

Old testament doesn't directly call to kill homosexual men...

>You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination. (NKJ, Leviticus 18:22)

>If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them. (NKJ, Leviticus 20:13)

It says "they shall surely be put to death", but it doesn't say by whom... It's not "you should surely put them to death"

It's an interpretation, at minima

If they happen to die because "god" killed them, they asked for it basically, that's one way to put it

Perspective ...

So yeah, the "sanitary and epidemiological and hygienic" aspect of things https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/safety/docs/ia_eu-ru_sps-req_req_san-epi_chap-2_1_en.pdf

That's a terrain on which the state has some legitimate ground to force his way on people in the name of the "greater good", interest of the whole over the individual

...

In the case of Uganda, they just decided to go for "we don't like gays because blah, also, god said it's bad anyway therefore fuck you"

And it works

http://gospel2012.fatcow.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Concentration-of-African-Muslims-and-Christians-Uganda-Circled.jpg

Personally, in my reich, I would ban "gay apology", just as "crime apology"

Of course it wouldn't remove gays, and that's not the point

You can suck dicks if you will at your home it's not my concern, however, you don't promote homosexuality in any shape or form within the public sphere, because that's my concern, because I'm reich furher and I'm responsible for it, and it's primarily designed for the well being of heterosexual families of the nation, first and foremost

Anyone perturbing this gets the stick, because they aren't helping, they are sabotaging my beautiful reich