Crusades when [665x319] | Poal: Say what you want.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (32).

[–] • 1 pt

Interesting thoughts, I appreciate the conversation.

Something that strikes me as odd about the troon shooting is just how fast we got all of the footage. All of it, like the same fucking day it happened. This makes it seem like it was prepared or something, police are never this transparent, especially when dead children are involved.

We have literally all of the footage of this one, from the bitch arriving, shooting her way in, all the way up to her getting shot 8 times. Remarkably, they even show what appears to be the corpse of a little girl in the hallway- this is extremely unusual, as police departments/feds tend to pretend to care about the children so much, they don't want anyone to see the uncensored footage of them dead/dying/being killed. Fuck, they removed the audio from the Uvalde hallway camera footage, allegedly because they didn't want us to "hear the children being killed". That made me really suspicious, made me question whether there was any shooting even happening...

But here we are with this one, with ALL of the info in our hands in less than two fucking days. Pretty wild.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Likewise, I appreciate the discussion.

I think the fact that the alarms went off because the troon shot through the door meant that all the hallways ended up being empty played a part (also debooonks the "it's fake why aren't there any kids in the hallways" thing) in them releasing the lead-up footage, and then I think for the breach and takedown they probably released that so that trannies don't freak out and claim the cops killed the troon for no reason (like niggers do). I'm sure another part of it is just related to different departments and states and how they handle footage. If they are forced to keep body cam footage around for FOIA they might have decided to release it to just avoid the FOIA rigamarole.

Generally speaking I do understand why they don't release footage which would show the actual kids getting shot or whatever.

As an aside fuck these kikes for passing "no gun zone" laws. Just like we saw with this one with the troon, she avoided hard targets.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

I say this often, but "Gun Free Zone" signs don't read the same to lunatics. This troon reads that sign, and sees "Helpless victims inside!".

Signs should be posted that say "50% of staff are trained and carrying concealed arms." I don't think this would deter many lunatics... although, this particular troon did have two targets in mind, and chose this place because she believed the other potential target had too much security. But if we can get rid of the perception that "schools are soft targets", maybe this shit wouldn't happen so frequently? And when it did, the teachers in the school could end it far before anyone even makes a 911 call!

This is the simplest solution to this bullshit. Arm willing teachers. Train them. Have them carry concealed- no students need to know which teachers are carrying and which aren't.

So when a psycho shoots their way into a school, kills a few people, rounds the corner and sees 63-year-old Mrs. Eldredge, a sweet old lady in a flowery dress, the last thing they'll expect is her pulling a 9mm out and putting a bullet in their rotten belly.

I always like to cite that church shooting from a while back, where that freak carried a shotgun in concealed, drew it and shot one person by surprising them... and then one of the guys in the congregation (retired or off-duty cop IIRC) pulls out his .357 and blew the freak's head off. Over in less than 3 seconds, all because ONE guy with a gun and the skill to use it was there.

That's the thing about mass shooters- they're not looking to fight, they're looking to slaughter, hence the choice of "soft targets". They know they will probably lose a gunfight against a trained person, even if they have a rifle and the trained person has a pistol. These incidents almost always end the same way- as soon as they encounter resistance, they either get shot dead, shoot themselves, or surrender; their "game" is over as soon as someone capable of taking their control away engages them. The fun is over, whatever rush they were feeling ends- they're not in charge suddenly. I think that really bothers the type of people who do shit like this.

I say this often, but "Gun Free Zone" signs don't read the same to lunatics. This troon reads that sign, and sees "Helpless victims inside!". Signs should be posted that say "50% of staff are trained and carrying concealed arms." I don't think this would deter many lunatics... although, this particular troon did have two targets in mind, and chose this place because she believed the other potential target had too much security. But if we can get rid of the perception that "schools are soft targets", maybe this shit wouldn't happen so frequently? And when it did, the teachers in the school could end it far before anyone even makes a 911 call! This is the simplest solution to this bullshit. Arm willing teachers. Train them. Have them carry concealed- no students need to know which teachers are carrying and which aren't. So when a psycho shoots their way into a school, kills a few people, rounds the corner and sees 63-year-old Mrs. Eldredge, a sweet old lady in a flowery dress, the last thing they'll expect is her pulling a 9mm out and putting a bullet in their rotten belly. I always like to cite that church shooting from a while back, where that freak carried a shotgun in concealed, drew it and shot one person by surprising them... and then one of the guys in the congregation (retired or off-duty cop IIRC) pulls out his .357 and blew the freak's head off. Over in less than 3 seconds, all because ONE guy with a gun and the skill to use it was there. That's the thing about mass shooters- they're not looking to fight, they're looking to slaughter, hence the choice of "soft targets". They know they will probably lose a gunfight against a trained person, even if they have a rifle and the trained person has a pistol. These incidents almost always end the same way- as soon as they encounter resistance, they either get shot dead, shoot themselves, or surrender; their "game" is over as soon as someone capable of taking their control away engages them. The fun is over, whatever rush they were feeling ends- they're not in charge suddenly. I think that *really* bothers the type of people who do shit like this.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

This is the simplest solution to this bullshit. Arm willing teachers. Train them. Have them carry concealed- no students need to know which teachers are carrying and which aren't.

I think the only reason we don't get that nationwide is because of nigger areas and classrooms. Granted they could just be left unarmed (lol) if they wanted to do that themselves, but I think our (((politicians))) don't want to touch it because it would look bad either way and they're retarded fucking spineless ziocucks.

I'm sure the (((media))) lobbies against fixing it too because they would lose the lever to push normies into wanting more gun control.

As I often say kicking the jews and non-Whites out (because it's not just niggers doing crime, though it's "mostly" just niggers and spics) would solve most problems overnight.

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)