WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

816

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I pretty much agree with that, I think one possibility is that people like this troon are MK Ultra'd in some fashion and they just let the chips fall where they may in terms of the "asset" choosing targets, methods of attack etc. It's definitely going to be difficult to have a compartmentalization scheme for anyone involved that actually does the attacks, as crazies tend not to follow orders well, especially if they know it's a one way ticket.

For other sorts of things like providing faked video and the like, that becomes a murky area where they could potentially have people working on it who think its for a TV show or something, but even that you would think they would realize when they watched the result. At the same time a LOT of normies don't bother looking into these things at all, so maybe they just don't bother watching the videos that come out of these things, but it would be a stretch for intelligence agencies to rely heavily on that being the case IMO.

9/11 was probably the last major, well-compartmentalized conspiracy which used foreign glowniggers to plant bombs, and possibly unmanned planes to crash into the buildings. It's still hard to believe there aren't a shit load of politicians who know the truth, can prove it, and none have come forward... they'd be literal heroes, gods to people like us. They'd probably be murdered, but that would only martyr them, which is probably the worst thing that could happen in a scenario like this.

That's pretty much what I think happened, with all of those involved being glowniggers or assets themselves and not caring either because 1) they agree with the aims of those doing it, and/or 2) the ZOG having blackmail on them, such as pedo-shit. Plus at this point anyone who comes forward would be summarily ending their public "normal" life if they came forward. However, some have definitely come forward on 9/11 over the years, one that comes to mind is Sybel Edmonds who was an FBI agent and warned about things related to the attack, and was ignored. And of course she's considered a "crazy conspiracy theorist" now because of speaking out. So there's definitely incentive to keep these things hidden even among those who may not be "in on" the conspiracy.

They've definitely gotten better at scrubbing information after the fact, such that you have to be quick to archive everything before it's just poof gone off the mainstream internet, than back in 2001. I was redpilled by 9/11 itself so it's been interesting watching the subsequent happenings and how they treat them.

As for relating this all back to the troon child-killer, I personally don't think it was a glow-op in the sense many people are saying just because I think we've all been wondering how long until one of these nutcase troons goes postal and does something horrible.

Plus of course we've seen the media downplay and misdirect on this one and the previous 3 trannies/fags that did shootings. That to me is a signal that these events go against the narrative and they are instead controlling the messaging after the fact.

[–] 1 pt

Interesting thoughts, I appreciate the conversation.

Something that strikes me as odd about the troon shooting is just how fast we got all of the footage. All of it, like the same fucking day it happened. This makes it seem like it was prepared or something, police are never this transparent, especially when dead children are involved.

We have literally all of the footage of this one, from the bitch arriving, shooting her way in, all the way up to her getting shot 8 times. Remarkably, they even show what appears to be the corpse of a little girl in the hallway- this is extremely unusual, as police departments/feds tend to pretend to care about the children so much, they don't want anyone to see the uncensored footage of them dead/dying/being killed. Fuck, they removed the audio from the Uvalde hallway camera footage, allegedly because they didn't want us to "hear the children being killed". That made me really suspicious, made me question whether there was any shooting even happening...

But here we are with this one, with ALL of the info in our hands in less than two fucking days. Pretty wild.

[–] 0 pt

Likewise, I appreciate the discussion.

I think the fact that the alarms went off because the troon shot through the door meant that all the hallways ended up being empty played a part (also debooonks the "it's fake why aren't there any kids in the hallways" thing) in them releasing the lead-up footage, and then I think for the breach and takedown they probably released that so that trannies don't freak out and claim the cops killed the troon for no reason (like niggers do). I'm sure another part of it is just related to different departments and states and how they handle footage. If they are forced to keep body cam footage around for FOIA they might have decided to release it to just avoid the FOIA rigamarole.

Generally speaking I do understand why they don't release footage which would show the actual kids getting shot or whatever.

As an aside fuck these kikes for passing "no gun zone" laws. Just like we saw with this one with the troon, she avoided hard targets.

[–] 1 pt

I say this often, but "Gun Free Zone" signs don't read the same to lunatics. This troon reads that sign, and sees "Helpless victims inside!".

Signs should be posted that say "50% of staff are trained and carrying concealed arms." I don't think this would deter many lunatics... although, this particular troon did have two targets in mind, and chose this place because she believed the other potential target had too much security. But if we can get rid of the perception that "schools are soft targets", maybe this shit wouldn't happen so frequently? And when it did, the teachers in the school could end it far before anyone even makes a 911 call!

This is the simplest solution to this bullshit. Arm willing teachers. Train them. Have them carry concealed- no students need to know which teachers are carrying and which aren't.

So when a psycho shoots their way into a school, kills a few people, rounds the corner and sees 63-year-old Mrs. Eldredge, a sweet old lady in a flowery dress, the last thing they'll expect is her pulling a 9mm out and putting a bullet in their rotten belly.

I always like to cite that church shooting from a while back, where that freak carried a shotgun in concealed, drew it and shot one person by surprising them... and then one of the guys in the congregation (retired or off-duty cop IIRC) pulls out his .357 and blew the freak's head off. Over in less than 3 seconds, all because ONE guy with a gun and the skill to use it was there.

That's the thing about mass shooters- they're not looking to fight, they're looking to slaughter, hence the choice of "soft targets". They know they will probably lose a gunfight against a trained person, even if they have a rifle and the trained person has a pistol. These incidents almost always end the same way- as soon as they encounter resistance, they either get shot dead, shoot themselves, or surrender; their "game" is over as soon as someone capable of taking their control away engages them. The fun is over, whatever rush they were feeling ends- they're not in charge suddenly. I think that really bothers the type of people who do shit like this.