This type of faggotry was inevitable the moment natural resource managers accepted the addition of "non-use" or "intrinsic" values in their cost-benefit analyses for different management practices.
On one side of the equation you have actual products and services like clean water, timber production, habitat improvement, fire hazard reduction, and active recreation. On the other you have the pleasure that some city-fuck derives just from knowing that the resource exists in an untouched state.
Still, why are they asking about "the so called right of free speech" and affirmative action, and abortion, and premarital sex, censoring conservative media etc etc etc???????
(post is archived)