>There is enough of a basis to want to marry a virgin that you really shouldn't dismiss the possibility of its importance. Where did that happen? Seriously? Stop. Re-read. Where did I dismiss the importance of virginity? I was commenting on what I thought the basis of the attraction was for the chink chasers. I have repeatedly stated on this forum that monogamy was the key to eurpean, particularly northern european success. Its what sets them apart and when you understand how monogamy works in an evolutionary context it is clear why. Here are the options. * matrilineal polygamy - a lot of african societies are this. Makes sense if your society is not that prosperous and private property isn’t a big thing. Women are relatively free sexually. Therefore it makes no sense for dad’s to invest heavily in child raising since paternity can’t be established with certainty. Mom lives with her mom and her brother. Maternal uncle is the “father figure. If he has any property it goes to nephews. Baby mommas are a thing, fathers aren’t. * patrilineal polygamy - females sexual behavior is tightly controlled, males not so much. These societies tend to have more property that can be handed from father to son so ensuring paternity is important. Hence the bed sheets over the ladies. The problem with PP is that an “alpha male” polygamist who has many wives can be 2x, 3x, 4x as reproductively successful as the average mid status guy in the society and many incels will always exist. And what makes a successful PP alpha male? Genetic traits like avariciousness (wealth to support many wives), high libido (desire to have many wives), high violence (ability to eliminate competitors for scarcity of females). That guy (greedy, rapey, head-choppy) has several times more children that the average guy, so the next generation of the society becomes more greedy, rapey, head choppy. A society that moves from monogamy to polygamy will become more corrupt and violent and rapey for these reasons. The quran does not make them that way. Natural selection under polygamy does. Pakis are inherently more violent than hindus and buddhists. There is a genetic reason that all those child grooming gangs in Britain were Pakis. * monogamy - males make a pact to only marry one woman. That doesn’t include divorce. If you divorce one wife and marry another, like Trump or Mel, this is polygamy. This creates a situation where there are many young male incels and incentivizes all the shitty things we hate about the middle east: violence, corruption, low trust, rapey-ness, child brides Monogamy incentivizes low violence among males which allows them to compete economically which produces a prosperous society. Men compete through hard work and high IQs and because there is no huge reproductive payoff for acquiring wealth, monogamist societies are more egalitarian and high trust. Women also tend to have a higher status in the community compared to polygamous women because men cannot play one female off another since they can only have one. This increases female bargaining power. Monogamist females genetically have a higher sense of self importance. So our society has been falling apart ever since we have allowed divorce and out of wedlock marriage. Im sure you can see the reasons why it is important to encourage virginity in females - it esstablishes paternity. Can you see why encouraging male virtue and monogamous males is important? Without it we will de-evolve in to low IQ rapey unproductive middle easterners. There is a reason that Islamic societies have a short prosperous period and then become shitholes. The genetic trade offs of polygamy catch up. All I hear on this site is how big a problem female promiscuity is. Rarely is male promiscuity mentioned. Males need to re-establish the monogamy pact and shame each other for breaking it. The Mel Gibson formula of reproduction is *guaranteed* to bring us to kiddie fucking, corrupt, head choppy sand niggerdom in 10 generations or less. All you need is ~10% of males having kids with more than one female. You are avoiding at least half of the problem. Evolution works like a machine. You change one setting and everything is different. >muh hypergamy You wont have that issue if most men agree to be monogamous and shun other males from their society.