I'm talking the ones for whom protection and enjoyment by humans of outdoor spaces (conservationists, vs preservationists) is the overarching driver of their political decisions. Not necessarily ones who share this view as one among equals in their beliefs.
Reasons:
1) "Conservation of state & national wilderness areas for white people to enjoy is racist" (already have seen some of this bubbling below the surface)
2) Environmentalists know that when nigs and spics do use public spaces, they trash the place, are noisy and disrespectful. Can't ignore that forever...
3) Importing third-world immigrants who keep lighting forest fires isn't going to stay quiet forever...
4) Bloating our population with resource-intensive trash-producing third-worlders can't sit well with old-school "population bomb" environmentalists
5) If it's not "muh global warming" your issues are at the back of the democrat bus
I'm talking the ones for whom protection *and enjoyment by humans of* outdoor spaces (conservationists, vs preservationists) is the overarching driver of their political decisions. Not necessarily ones who *share* this view as one among equals in their beliefs.
Reasons:
1) "Conservation of state & national wilderness areas for white people to enjoy is racist" (already have seen some of this bubbling below the surface)
2) Environmentalists know that when nigs and spics *do* use public spaces, they trash the place, are noisy and disrespectful. Can't ignore that forever...
3) Importing third-world immigrants who keep lighting forest fires isn't going to stay quiet forever...
4) Bloating our population with resource-intensive trash-producing third-worlders can't sit well with old-school "population bomb" environmentalists
5) If it's not "muh global warming" your issues are at the back of the democrat bus
(post is archived)