Looks like it's time to put on the old strategy hat and start planning how to butcher this idea. "Policy 1" can be eviscerated easily enough by having larger networks actively supporting smaller ones. If $platform\_service bans $small\_shitpost\_forum, then $big\_angry\_network needs to actively take shits on the face of $platform\_service, its management, and its investors. Attacking an "online hate group", regardless of its size, needs to become economic suicide. "Policy 2" is best attacked through side-channel communication and a smaller scale application of counterstrategy one. If Jeff McShitposts gets banned from coolforums.com, he can post about it on angryrants.net, letting everyone know that Mike the Moderator is an unrepentant dog-botherer. From here, we can apply the first counterstrategy: make Mike nuclear and drive him into isolation (and hopefully death). "Policy 3" could be called the "Reddit Strategy" - and it can best be countered by active, enthusiastic participation and eager, aggressive buy-in. If some organisation wants to fill its forum with shills, then the best thing one can do is help the process along. Run the forum into the ground, until all that remains is a massive leftist circlejerk, slowly costing its paymasters shekels for nothing. Then go make a new forum - servers are cheap - and keep hating. "Policy 4" is defeated by No More Brother Wars, by accepting that the Enemy of my Enemy is, if nothing else, temporarily useful, and that we can all get back to fighting one another once the globalist elite are all swinging from some sturdy ropes. Furthermore, it can be helpful to remember that we don't all have to fight side by side, as long as we're all ultimately aimed at the same target. *Odium Invictus.*