There's a button that allows for using the title of the link as it was originally posted. What's wrong with that? If you really want someone's take on what they have posted, just ask.
If you really want someone's take on what they have posted, just ask.
And ask what? I'm not a mind reader .. have no idea most times why a poster posts something.
He/she posted for a reason, right?
Otherwise its just spam or clickbait .
And ask what?
Ask them for their take, like what you want to hear.
Otherwise its just spam or clickbait .
If I post some news article without my take on it, I'm spamming and clickbaiting? News titles tend to be somewhat clickbait so I can give you that to a degree, but spam? Can you tell me what you define spam to mean, please? Is full of spam?
s/news spam?
Some are ... as I see it most are.
Why? Zero analysis.
The OP has zero responsibility to point out why he posted a link, that's basically the definition of clickbait.
(post is archived)