As long as not one photo exists of a man besides one of Hans’ own body, then he is the only authority and can proclaim anyone to be any gender with no transferable foundation to his claims.
If he agreed that another photo exists of a man, that photo would be a tool to challenge his authority when he makes his dubious claims.
I.e. “...But this guy has similar features to the guy you said is definitely male, Hans. See? Let’s compare and talk about the similarities”
With no quantifiable Archetype, there is no truth, only hearsay. He remains the decider of reality, adjusting the parameters as he pleases.
Gig is up, fake Christian. You’re a Talmudic shill
As long as not **one** photo exists of a man besides one of Hans’ *own body*, then he is the only authority and can proclaim anyone to be any gender with no transferable foundation to his claims.
If he agreed that another photo exists of a man, that photo would be a tool to challenge his authority when he makes his dubious claims.
I.e. “...But this guy has similar features to the guy you said is definitely male, Hans. See? Let’s compare and talk about the similarities”
With no quantifiable Archetype, there is no truth, only hearsay. He remains the decider of reality, adjusting the parameters as he pleases.
Gig is up, fake Christian. You’re a Talmudic shill
(post is archived)