That rock didnt melt. The argument is that lava is NOT a melted rock its a type of glass. Which your video actually supports. If anything, glass was made. Thats a chemical reaction not a physical reaction. Do you even chemistry?
You should probably have been more clear in your case. You said to find a video of a stone being melted. Granite is a great example. You say "river rock". You can find granite stones in rivers.
You are construing that rocks are not glass, yet say that rocks contain glass. Then you say that lava is glass. If rocks melt and produce molten glass, then that is simply how the world works. It doesn't mean you can't melt rocks.
Youre a tranny and theres a reason that "educator" disabled comments because its a bogus claim to have melted rock.
Just because you take my words and mush them into an unintelligable mess doesnt mean im not being clear. Just shows youre an asshole not interested in the truth but rather arguing. God bless you, dumb tranny.
Your original argument is simply based on a fallacy to start with. You claim that lava is glass (fine, you can have that), but are trying to say that stone can not melt. It's not a valid comparison. The lava was the part of rocks that could melt and then flowed forth. Thus, rocks WERE melted to make that fucking lava. If you want to be super nitpicky, you can say the rocks were broken down via heat and the silica portions of it turned to glass.
Just fucking say what you mean. Your OP makes it sound like volcanoes are fake or something,
you take my words and mush them into an unintelligable mess
You've already done that all by yourself.
(post is archived)