WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

951
  1. Putt's canary died.
  2. Putt has become a huge faggot since his canary died.
  3. One of Putt's builders just got doxxed and apparently looks like a Kike. (But I missed the pics.)

And recently Putt has been shilling for PIA. Should we be using PIA? Is it compromised? I like it, but can you suggest any good alternatives? (If it doesn't accept crypto, GTFO.)

1. Putt's canary died. 2. Putt has become a huge faggot since his canary died. 3. One of Putt's builders just got doxxed and apparently looks like a Kike. (But I missed the pics.) And recently Putt has been shilling for PIA. Should we be using PIA? Is it compromised? I like it, but can you suggest any good alternatives? (If it doesn't accept crypto, GTFO.)

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

He claims is non-logging.

I'm an insider in the field. I have to temper my response here because if I sound angry at all, then it will undermine my point. And meanwhile, I'm not angry. But for the person running a VPN to claim that they don't log, makes about as much sense as for a snake to claim that it won't bite you.

Which to be clear is not to say that a snake will bite you, just that it is a bit ridiculous to base any of your decision making around these types of claims.

[–] 1 pt

Feds or others could require you to log things, or confirm others logs or data, and no one break a sweat.

Sometimes its all perfectly reasonable why and maybe for the good, so to speak, others is clearly difficult to tell how it would not be slimy.

I don't think you have to worry about saying it, even if you feel strongly about it. :)