Well good to know being negative doesn't have any effects think i should leave it that way?
It worked for me and I'm back out of the negatives.
It has ramifications.
If it limits people, the community can force people into silence. If it doesn't limit people, idiots can keep going and you'll probably want to be a more hands-on admin than we see in other communities.
I suspect the way you're approaching this makes the latter more attractive.
We can see that there are people here who DV based on perceived slights and not merits - and I'd absolutely expect that you'll see more of that behavior. If you're willing to remain hands-on, the not limiting probably makes more sense and is seemingly more consistent with your message.
I think I agree for now at least I'll stick with no limits due to score.
That makes the most sense, given that you plan on remaining active and not just letting the site go to hell and run itself.
I seem to have pushed a key combination that brought up page info in firefox.
It worked out okay - check your meta keywords when you get a minute.
Personally im torn on that. It wasnt my intent to silence them with the downvoting, just display dissatisfaction.
But the DV restrictions on voat DID work for their purpose very well IMO
I'm going to keep it the way it is at least for now.
(post is archived)