Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

879

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts (edited )

They did a really good job at turning people away from investigating it by creating those disinfo bots that spammed reddit/voats PG subs.

I personally walked away from investigating it after Alex Jones revealed himself as yet another disinfo agent so my entire bank of knowledge on PG was corrupt from the beginning.

I literally would have to start from scratch (with sources) after years of disinfo shills covering up the real information.

=\

[–] • 3 pts

It's a shame but most "big names" in the conspiracy or alt-news/alt-right have turned out to be controlled oppositon or gatekeepers.

[–] • 1 pt

PG may or may not be real, but at this point how much can be attributed to political threater?

There is overwhelming evidence of pedophilia and sex trafficking. But where to begin looking is completely lost nowadays. No new information had been released, considering the biggest leads came from the Clinton dump. Coincidentally we still don’t know exactly where the emails came from (probably Rich), how they got to wikileaks in the first place is also beyond me.

It’s also heavily theorized Wikileaks is a CIA psyop, which could explain the limited nature of the email dump and why the most incriminating evidence (which wikileaks suppossdly has/had) was never dumped. Instead, we were given enough crumbs to play.