Correct.
Correct.
That could be because you're approaching it from a moral framework rather than pragmatism. If that's it, there's nothing I can do to help with that.
Also my wording may have been a little careless. Some would say murder can't be legal, so by legalizing it we would make it not murder by definition. But I wanted to highlight the immorality of it, because I believe we should discourage and shame the act even while allowing it. This would create the best outcomes.
That could be because you're approaching it from a moral framework rather than pragmatism. If that's it, there's nothing I can do to help with that.
Also my wording may have been a little careless. Some would say murder can't be legal, so by legalizing it we would make it *not murder* by definition. But I wanted to highlight the immorality of it, because I believe we should discourage and shame the act even while allowing it. This would create the best outcomes.
Not approaching from a moral anything.
If it's a human you pragmatically shouldn't allow the killing of it without its permission. Else what's to stop someone (the govt) from deeming you unworthy of life later down the road?
Not approaching from a moral anything.
If it's a human you pragmatically shouldn't allow the killing of it without its permission. Else what's to stop someone (the govt) from deeming you unworthy of life later down the road?
(post is archived)