Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

179

So, since the controversy's grown and more information's come up and things have occurred, I thought I might give my final thoughts.

First off, Matt Watson was right to make a video about the legitimate issue of sexual exploitation of children. If I saw it was a constant issue, I would discuss this issue publicly and ask YouTube to do something about it. However, he had a completely incorrect approach by not encouraging creators to do something about it but encouraging advertisers to drop YouTube because it hurts innocent creators who weren't at fault. If I were him, I would've encouraged creators to reach out to YouTube about this issue instead of trying to get advertisers to drop YouTube. In addition, I'm skeptical of his intentions. There is a video out there from an older channel of his where he honks his horn at a presumably young girl and asks her if she wants to make an adult video. Will not link to it because I don't want to get in trouble but it is true and it makes me think he is a hypocrite regarding this.

Secondly, it is becoming more clear that YouTube IS doing something about it. And I'm glad they are taking down these videos and removing illegal comments. This part is rather complex as when you have a larger platform, it is nearly impossible to filter content automatically for this or that. While algorithms are a quick way to try to solve this issue, it's heavily prone to errors. It is why the CDA Section 230 removes the liability of neutral online service providers from what users do on their platform. The only really accurate way to filter this kind of stuff is through humans flagging the content and humans reviewing them and taking them down.

Finally, I really do think YouTube should be a 13+ site and stop doing the YouTube Kids thing. It would be a good solution to reduce the amount of occurrences of pedophilia comments. Moreover, parents need to know the reality which is that the internet is not a babysitter. It's not the same as cable television where all the content is handpicked by a few executives of the company to air.

This is honestly all I'm gonna say on the topic. Time to move on with life to other things that are worth more of my time.

So, since the controversy's grown and more information's come up and things have occurred, I thought I might give my final thoughts. First off, Matt Watson was right to make a video about the legitimate issue of sexual exploitation of children. If I saw it was a constant issue, I would discuss this issue publicly and ask YouTube to do something about it. However, he had a completely incorrect approach by not encouraging creators to do something about it but encouraging advertisers to drop YouTube because it hurts innocent creators who weren't at fault. If I were him, I would've encouraged creators to reach out to YouTube about this issue instead of trying to get advertisers to drop YouTube. In addition, I'm skeptical of his intentions. There is a video out there from an older channel of his where he honks his horn at a presumably young girl and asks her if she wants to make an adult video. Will not link to it because I don't want to get in trouble but it is true and it makes me think he is a hypocrite regarding this. Secondly, it is becoming more clear that YouTube IS doing something about it. And I'm glad they are taking down these videos and removing illegal comments. This part is rather complex as when you have a larger platform, it is nearly impossible to filter content automatically for this or that. While algorithms are a quick way to try to solve this issue, it's heavily prone to errors. It is why the CDA Section 230 removes the liability of neutral online service providers from what users do on their platform. The only really accurate way to filter this kind of stuff is through humans flagging the content and humans reviewing them and taking them down. Finally, I really do think YouTube should be a 13+ site and stop doing the YouTube Kids thing. It would be a good solution to reduce the amount of occurrences of pedophilia comments. Moreover, parents need to know the reality which is that the internet is not a babysitter. It's not the same as cable television where all the content is handpicked by a few executives of the company to air. This is honestly all I'm gonna say on the topic. Time to move on with life to other things that are worth more of my time.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (5).
[–] • 4 pts

I'm sorry but I have to disagree here, at least a little. Youtube should have never allowed this to happen in the first place, the minute it was notice or pointed out there should have been a human being sorting through and removing this content. If there is any higher responsibility in life than protecting children from monsters then I'm not sure what it is. They have tons of employees 10 or 20 people probably could have handled this in a matter of days and yeah it would not have been a fun job but it is something that should have been done. You cannot just let an algorithm handle something like this, sure that can be one of your tools but if people are using your platform for pedophilia you need to step in and do something.

[–] • 0 pt

YouTube seems to have quite enough SJW-commie personnel to censor any conservative content, ban, demonetize, etc. within hours. Methinks stopping feminazis from shitting their panties, or NPCs from going into meltdown mode is the priority. Besides, the topic of pedophilia requires more brainpower than most socialists have to work with. Pedophilia for norms? BAAAAD!!!! Pedophilia for cameljockeys? GOOOOD!!!! Hence censors must determine whether content creator is a norm, or cameljockey, and whether said example is real pedophilia (illegal perversion), or fake pedophilia (a legal and sharia-protected good thang).

[–] • 0 pt

Doesn’t matter if you can’t see the importance of protecting the next generation and ensuring they grow up to be productive members of society then in my opinion you are not worth saving.

[–] • 0 pt

YouTube is what YouTube is...one can either accept it as is, and continue to support (i.e. use it) as is, boycott it, or find/create an alternative. YouTube does not care about "protecting the next generation" other than maybe from conservative ideas. YouTube is focused on PC culture, and disseminating Leftard propaganda. Expecting YouTube/Twitter/Facebook to share your values, goals, etc., is like expecting thugboys not to go pillaging, or third-worlders not to violate the border, or Michael Moore to support your right to Free Speech.