I guess in a way yeah, they had taxes and they gave incentives especially to couples that wanted to have children, to help strong families thrive. Agree with it or not that is still a form of socialism and taking from the wealthy produces to prop up people who may or may not use it to become wealthy. On the whole I would say that was a fairly success wealth generation device but its still a form of redistribution.

from memory:

hitler and the new government wanted to reverse the inclusion of women in the workplace and encourage large families. To this end, they offered a loan of 4,000 Deutsch marks to any German woman who willingly left the workforce to get married to a German male and produced a child within 2 years. for each child produced within 5 years, 1,000 Deutsch marks would be forgiven from the loan. after the 4th child the loan was completely forgiven.

This had the effect of creating a labor shortage as women jumped at this chance for money and spent it on child cribs, down payments on a house, and a savings of which most germans had never had in their families history. Surviving records show less than 1% of women who took this loan has to repay more than 1,000 Deutsch marks, and 0.5% had to stop at 2 children due to medical complications. when this was listed as a certified condition presented to the government, the remaining loan was often forgiven in secret so long as they kept silent about the forgiveness. For society to return to the natural state, everyone in germany must believe a family unit is the best form of perfection to strive towards.

This is why nationalism is a thing.

What's a good pdf upload site? I'll just link you their economic manifesto and you can read it yourself. Catbox and picinfinity have never worked for me for this purpose.

The question isn't, "is national-socialism socialism?" It clearly is. It's in the name, it's creators have admitted as much, and have elaborated to support their arguments for our own understanding. The challenge is researching how each country employed their variant of national socialist policy to address concerns within their nation.

However, the real question a person should be asking is, "what are the differences between international socialism, sometimes referred to as **** and ****?" What were the respective goals of the differing socio-political/socio-economic ideologies that provoked one to be promoted by one group and vilified by another? Once you understand those differences, you might begin to understand why European elites felt it necessary to employ the Jewish community in the ways that they have against the general population and to what ends these strategies served.