- Can someone create a subverse called IMAdumbasslibtard?
- Can they then post any legal content they like in there?
What you call censorship, I call being unpopular. The community decides, based on framework created by admins, but admins are not banning subverses or specific users based on their views.
You keep saying the same things over and over and I keep quoting myself, so that'll do it for me.
- Can someone create a subverse called IMAdumbasslibtard?
- Can they then post any legal content they like in there?
What you call censorship, I call being unpopular. The community decides, based on framework created by admins, but admins are not banning subverses or specific users based on their views.
You keep saying the same things over and over and I keep quoting myself, so that'll do it for me.
What you call censorship, I call being unpopular. The community decides,
As I said, the community is an extreme ideological distillation. The "unpopularity" is unavoidably associated with ideology. It is ideological censorship.
> What you call censorship, I call being unpopular. The community decides,
As I said, the community is an extreme ideological distillation. The "unpopularity" is unavoidably associated with ideology. It is ideological censorship.
(post is archived)