Earth is flat | Poal: Say what you want.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (50).

[–] • 0 pt

I can only repeat myself so many times. We are limited to what we can see with our eyes. If you take a telescope, you can see more stars.

You say, "bullshit". Try it. Same thing happens with boats going over the curve. What do you think about that? Or are you going to ignore that again.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

I can only repeat myself so many times.

It's not a matter of repeating yourself. You never answered my questions:

You: "The rotating hemispheres are the limit of our perspective."

Me: "That doesn't make any sense. Why are they rotating? Are they actual objects?"

You say, "bullshit". Try it.

How about YOU try it and make a video. Should be easy on any clear night. Just pick a constellation, wait for it to go below the horizon, and bring out your magic telescope to bring it back into view.

Same thing happens with boats going over the curve. What do you think about that?

Saying it's so doesn't make it true. You can find videos online where this does not happen. Plenty of examples of tall objects dipping below the horizon, where the tall part remains in view. And of course there's the FUCKING SUN. How you retards try and pretend it doesn't dip below the horizon as it sets is quite spectacular. Truly class A morons.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

'Rotating hemispheres' was your choice of words...I would call it the rotation of the stars seen from our limited perspective.

Maybe I'll save up for a Nikon P900 or P1000 and I can show you, but I'm sure you'll just make me jump through another hoop after that one. But fair enough.

Here's some videos that show the boat coming back into view: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DRRyZBL4OQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DRRyZBL4OQ (edit - here's another one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7ZwE3uArfQ)

And here's one showing the sun come back up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk1VlrAujiA (edit #2 - another sun coming back up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G19hmYbk87g) (edit #3 - another sun... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUZVcfo864M)

Edit #4 - here's a video for anyone else following along who's interested: https://www.bitchute.com/video/LZI1osCfizg/

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

'Rotating hemispheres' was your choice of words...I would call it the rotation of the stars seen from our limited perspective.

I chose those words because that's what's shown on the video you linked. You never disputed those words, used them yourself, and even here you use the word "rotation". There's no explanation about why they are there. It's obvious they are there as a non-sensical, ad hoc explanation to account for the rotation we see at both poles, which is trivially explained by a spherical Earth.

Here's some videos that show the boat coming back into view: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DRRyZBL4OQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DRRyZBL4OQ

Wow, a camera focused at the foreground, where the people are on the beach, doesn't show a boat off in the distance. But if you zoom in on the boat, it magically appears! Wow! Did you notice at 37 seconds the boat appears to be submerged below water? Gee, look at that, you proved yourself wrong.

(edit - here's another one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7ZwE3uArfQ)

Same principle applies about focusing on near foreground objects versus distant background objects. Also, in this video, there's clearly distortion from water vapor, and I suspect the camera can't focus that far anyway. So not a good video. A real test would show a ship with a tall mast, like they had back in ancient times, and thus could see it descend below the horizon. Here's an example (youtube.com): You can see at 1:47 there's a tall mast in the background above the horizon, but the body of the boat is not visible.

Maybe I'll save up for a Nikon P900 or P1000 and I can show you, but I'm sure you'll just make me jump through another hoop after that one. But fair enough.

You can show me more stars --- you can do that with any patch of sky, because some stars are feint and not visible with the naked eye. What you can't show me is a particular star that dips below the horizon and comes back into view. Try it with binoculars on a known bright star. Or better yet, use a bright planet that dips below the horizon.

And here's one showing the sun come back up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk1VlrAujiA

Lulz. You show me a video of the sun setting, and at 1:19 you can clearly see how the sphere slowly descends below the horizon, exactly what you would expect on a spherical Earth, and exactly not what you would expect on a flat Earth.. You proved yourself wrong, again.

What you see in the beginning is lens flare and the camera sensors being overloaded. As he zooms in, the light levels are adjusted for the blinding sun, and you can see the actual outline, which shows it ABOVE the horizon at the start, though the bottom is obscured by a cloud. You're really grasping at straws.

> 'Rotating hemispheres' was your choice of words...I would call it the rotation of the stars seen from our limited perspective. I chose those words because that's what's shown on the video you linked. You never disputed those words, used them yourself, and even here you use the word "rotation". There's no explanation about why they are there. It's obvious they are there as a non-sensical, ad hoc explanation to account for the rotation we see at both poles, which is trivially explained by a spherical Earth. > Here's some videos that show the boat coming back into view: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DRRyZBL4OQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DRRyZBL4OQ Wow, a camera focused at the foreground, where the people are on the beach, doesn't show a boat off in the distance. But if you zoom in on the boat, it magically appears! Wow! Did you notice at 37 seconds the boat appears to be submerged below water? Gee, look at that, you proved yourself wrong. > (edit - here's another one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7ZwE3uArfQ) Same principle applies about focusing on near foreground objects versus distant background objects. Also, in this video, there's clearly distortion from water vapor, and I suspect the camera can't focus that far anyway. So not a good video. A real test would show a ship with a tall mast, like they had back in ancient times, and thus could see it descend below the horizon. Here's an [example](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPE8ERYsQW4): You can see at 1:47 there's a tall mast in the background above the horizon, but the body of the boat is not visible. > Maybe I'll save up for a Nikon P900 or P1000 and I can show you, but I'm sure you'll just make me jump through another hoop after that one. But fair enough. You can show me more stars --- you can do that with any patch of sky, because some stars are feint and not visible with the naked eye. What you can't show me is a particular star that dips below the horizon and comes back into view. Try it with binoculars on a known bright star. Or better yet, use a bright planet that dips below the horizon. > And here's one showing the sun come back up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk1VlrAujiA Lulz. You show me a video of the sun setting, and at 1:19 you can clearly see how the sphere slowly descends below the horizon, exactly what you would expect on a spherical Earth, and exactly not what you would expect on a flat Earth.. You proved yourself wrong, again. What you see in the beginning is lens flare and the camera sensors being overloaded. As he zooms in, the light levels are adjusted for the blinding sun, and you can see the actual outline, which shows it ABOVE the horizon at the start, though the bottom is obscured by a cloud. You're really grasping at straws.

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)