WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

806

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 3 pts 4y

Good points, but let me ask you this. Does that somehow make what Soros is doing less real?

[–] 0 pt 4y

Not sure what you mean by less real. Do you mean less evil?

[–] 2 pts 4y

Nobody here is holding Glen Beck out to be a role model.

Beck wasn't expressing a value judgement or an opinion here - he was expressing a fact.

You've committed an ad hominem fallacy. With this technique, you can dismiss any criticism of media brought forth by high profile whistle blowers. Any character flaw can be used as a basis to "discredit" the witness. And very few people who work in media are without any flaws (real or perceived).

But I think you already knew that.

[–] 0 pt 4y

Glen Beck and Glen Beck's created fame is synthetic and manipulative , and it works, Ad Hominem is an irrelevant bucket of shit.

[–] -1 pt 4y (edited 4y)

No. Glenn Beck is a shill. He is not some random whistle blower. He gets paid to push propaganda to conservatives.

Beck wasn't expressing a value judgement or an opinion here - he was expressing a fact.

Please. That's like saying CNN or ABC just express facts.

[–] 0 pt 4y

Whooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh