Good points, but let me ask you this. Does that somehow make what Soros is doing less real?
Not sure what you mean by less real. Do you mean less evil?
Nobody here is holding Glen Beck out to be a role model.
Beck wasn't expressing a value judgement or an opinion here - he was expressing a fact.
You've committed an ad hominem fallacy. With this technique, you can dismiss any criticism of media brought forth by high profile whistle blowers. Any character flaw can be used as a basis to "discredit" the witness. And very few people who work in media are without any flaws (real or perceived).
But I think you already knew that.
Glen Beck and Glen Beck's created fame is synthetic and manipulative , and it works, Ad Hominem is an irrelevant bucket of shit.
No. Glenn Beck is a shill. He is not some random whistle blower. He gets paid to push propaganda to conservatives.
Beck wasn't expressing a value judgement or an opinion here - he was expressing a fact.
Please. That's like saying CNN or ABC just express facts.
Whooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh
(post is archived)