WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] 8 pts 4y

Doesn’t matter. They will easily just change the definition or include “medical device” in an amendment to the current laws.

[–] 4 pts 4y

"They" will be some obscure, un-elected asshole with a God complex who is wearing a black robe while sitting on xher or xhis wooden throne in some backwater courthouse. No amendment needed.

[–] 0 pt 4y

At which point “Hillbilly” Justice will be served via lead. (((His))) replacement won’t try it again. That’s what has to take place for all this to stop, if it ever does. Mad max is the only way.

[–] 2 pts 4y

Bro as long as the internet works and there is food no one cares enough to commit murder besides the ZOG

[–] 0 pt 4y

Never gonna happen. Notice all the Governors leading carefree lives?

[–] 0 pt 4y

Still won't take it.

If they intentionally ruin my life over it, that would be the breaking point. I would no longer care what happens to me. I would seek revenge.

[–] 0 pt 4y

You WILL care, when it is actually happening

[–] 0 pt 4y

You miss my point. I would no longer care about any consequences for my actions, therefore all is fair game. Unfortunately, I lost all my firearms in this tragic boating accident...

[–] 0 pt 4y

Considering Noubar Afeyan was the chairman of Moderna's board(web.archive.org), owns almost 40% of the company, and is part of Operation Warp Speed(web.archive.org); I'm sure laws and regulations will be twisted to ensure maximum profit distribution of the "vaccine".

[–] 4 pts 4y

Archive: https://archive.vn/nRhvW

Also a Catbox for the segment of the video discussing this:

___

___

Transcript from the segment as noted in the article:

___

" Let’s make sure we’re clear on something let’s stipulate that this is not a vaccine. We’re using the term “vaccine” to sneak this thing under public health exemptions. This is not a vaccine. This is an mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator. It is not a vaccine vaccines are actually a legally-defined term, and they’re legally defined term under public health law they’re legally defined term under CDC and FDA standards.

And a vaccine specifically has to stimulate both an immunity in the person receiving it but it also has to disrupt transmission. And that is not what this is. They have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell is not to stop transmission. It is a treatment. But if it were discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health authorities because then people would say, “What other treatments are there?”

The use of the term “vaccine” is unconscionable for both the legal definition of it, but also it is actually also the “sucker punch” to open and free discourse because by saying “vaccine” you dump it into a thing where you can be anti- or pro- the therapy. But if you actually talked about it as a therapy remember and people forget this Moderna was started as a chemotherapy company for cancer not a vaccine manufacturer for SARS. If we said we were going to give people a prophylactic chemotherapy for the cancer they don’t have, you’d be laughed out of a room because it’s a stupid idea.

That’s exactly what this is this is a mechanical device in the form of a very small packet of technology that is being inserted into the human system and activate the cell to become a pathogen manufacturing site. And I refuse to stipulate in any conversations that this is a “vaccine” issue. The only reason why the term is being used is to abuse the 1905 Jacobson case that has been misrepresented since it was written. And if we were honest with this, we would actually call it what it is it is a chemical pathogen device that is actually meant to unleash a chemical pathogen production action within a cell. It is a medical device not a drug because it meets the CDRH [FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health] definition of a device. It is not a living system it is not a biologic system it is a physical technology it just happens to come in the size of a molecular package.

So we need to be really clear in making sure we don’t fall for their game because their game is if we talk about it as a “vaccine”, then we are going to get into a “vaccine” conservation but this is not by their own admission a vaccine. As a result, it must be clear to everyone listening that we will not fall for this failed definition just like we won’t fall for their industrial-chemical definition of “health” because both of them are functionally flawed and are an explicit violation of the legal construct that is being exploited….If you stipulate that it is a “vaccine”, you’ve already lost the battle….

80% of the people allegedly exposed to the virus have no symptoms at all they are called “asymptomatic carriers”. 80% of the people who get this injected into them have a “clinical adverse event”. You are getting injected with a chemical substance to induce illness not to induce a immune-transmissive response. In other words, nothing about this is going to stop you from transmitting anything. This is about getting you sick and having your own cells be the thing that get you sick. "

___

↓ expand content
[–] 2 pts 4y

Much simpler argument:

"I will not take this injection, and if someone attempts to force it on me, that needle will be going in their fucking eye instead."

[–] 2 pts 4y

They've never let little details like legal definitions of words hold them back before.

[–] 0 pt 4y

(((They))) WILL force you.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt 4y

You got to stop playing the legal argument game. These people are tyrants and they do not follow the law. Acts of violence against them and their family members is how you keep them in line.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt 4y

Only the naive believe that things like laws or rights protect anyone but the ruling class.

[–] 0 pt 4y

They're off the shelf angiotensin 2 blockers nothing else.