![No, man. I'm not addicted. I just like doing it everyday and get irritable if I don't. [1080x1080 - 89KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/AJhznb.jpg){kind=link}
I don't follow the V2 cult as there is lietrally nothing binding that was issued from it. I attend the TLM and am traditional. And no, we don't follow the Pope. We are in communion with him as the VIcar of Christ. we follow the teaching of the CHurch as has been handed down by the Church. If the Pope strays from that, good for him, but i will not lament the loss of tepid souls like the V2 followers and the obstinate schimastics and heretics like you. IN any case, i don't have time for you heretics. You can sit at home and do nothing catholic and shit on anyone living the life and partaking in the sacraments and you are content wallowing in your own pride. Heretics and schismatics get the old sword+bowel treatment as prescribed by St Louis. Get lost protestant heretic. You have abandonned the barque like the fidgety protties.
I'm sorry, but that's just not the case. Michael Davies promoted a lot of lies like the one you mention about VII not being binding. If Vatican II wasn't binding then why are SSPX priest and the like not in full communion with Rome? It's like that one Anglican convert priest who was excommunicated for a sermon where he denounced VII. Your priest won't denounce VII. Ask him to. He won't do it, because that is his religion. All novus ordo priests, including the ones that say the 1962 Latin mass are in full agreement with Vatican II, besides SSPX and the other resistance groups.
I'm not trying to condemn you (actually you're the one that is condemning me). I was there at one time as well, but you can't stand for the Catholic truth when your priests, bishops, and pope are not Catholic. What will you say to your priest when he turns protestants away? What will you say to your priest when he gives an annulment out to those who clearly have a valid marriage? It's definitely happening. What will you say to your priest when he remains silent on the continued apostasy of the so called pope and bishops? Will you go to his bishop?
The VII religion continues to go deeper in its apostasy and even conservative Catholics who believe they can resist it are changing their beliefs on the role of the Pope like you just mentioned earlier about how you don't follow the Pope. That is contrary to Catholic teaching.
In regards to the SSPX, there is no such thing as partial communion with Rome. Oddly enough, this is what the modernists would say and you side with protestants and schismatics hen you say things like this. It's exactly what i hear from the NO folks as well so you have obviously accepted their talking points. IN any case, go ahead and sit there all alone in your room, while you neglect partaking in the sacraments and being completely content and trusting of your own judgment all those bishops, priests and faithful catholic. So according to you, it is not enough to be a faithful catholic that lives the sacraments, communes frequently, does confession, gives alms and does penance and has large families that also partake in the sacraments, to be saved. NO accroding to you, we must sit at home in judgment off those faithful catholics and simply believe ON the Lord, exactly liek the protestants. good luck with that.
I'm not part of the VII Church. You are. I'm just using what they say to make a point. Speaking of protestants and schismatics, Francis and the VII bishops have no problem with Catholics going to protestant and schismatic services. If your priest said you couldn't go to this, you could go to his bishop and report him and he would be reprimanded. This happens all the time in VII churches. People complaining about priests being too conservative. VII religion encourages non-Catholic worship. Pachamama is a good example of this.
I'm not a home aloner. I receive the sacraments from a real Roman Catholic priest. Luckily there is an old rite ordained pre-V2 priest in my area. He is very old. You know they changed the rite of ordination? The ordination of the priests and bishops of the VII rite is doubtful. There is a good argument to prove this. Pope Leo XIII said the Anglican priesthood was invalid because the form is invalid. See this: https://novusordowatch.org/wp-content/uploads/purging-priesthood.pdf
(post is archived)