Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Having watched this brazen criminal activity for quite some time, I have noticed a distinct change in the surveillance patterns in the last week or so. MANY new targets. Lots of them. If you see and/or hear low flying planes regularly, you just might be on the target list. If you coincidentally hear these assholes roar their engine when you exit a building, that is them trying to make you look up to get your face entered into the targeting computer.

Having watched this brazen criminal activity for quite some time, I have noticed a distinct change in the surveillance patterns in the last week or so. MANY new targets. Lots of them. If you see and/or hear low flying planes regularly, you just might be on the target list. If you coincidentally hear these assholes roar their engine when you exit a building, that is them trying to make you look up to get your face entered into the targeting computer.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (33).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

What you choose to believe does not dictate what I know. I already told you the truth, you can verify this for yourself or not, I don't care.

[–] • 0 pt

"This is my truth."

"It was real in my mind."

I verified that your "evidence" was just a couple training flights for newbie pilots. You replied with reddit-tier garbage. "You can verify this for yourself" is not how you make a claim. If you make a claim, it's on you to prove it, otherwise you're just full of hot air. "It's not my job to educate you" is the mantra of SJW faggots with no argument.

Let's try a different angle. Christine Blasey-Ford told (her version of) the "truth" when she accused Kavanaugh of gang rape. Should everyone have just "verified it for themselves" that she "already told the truth"? Of course not. And she couldn't.

Now what if I were to say "Mister_Sunshine raped and murdered a young girl" while just showing that she lived in the same town as you. Then when you said "prove it," I replied with "I already told you the truth" and you were sentenced for it. You'd sure be 100% onboard with claims requiring evidence then, wouldn't you?

But whatever. Can't logic a fool out of a position they didn't logic themselves into to begin with. Enjoy being a paranoid nutter who howls at the sky. If they wanted to spy on you, they wouldn't need to burn $70 an hour on fuel alone to do so.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

"Training flights" that clearly and repeatedly violate the 1,000 foot from any occupied space rule are totally legit.

No.

[–] • 0 pt

Provide evidence they've violated this rule. If you have this evidence and you know the tail numbers, they can be reported to the FAA. And if they were flying that low, thousands of people would have seen this and called about it.

Oh wait, you're moving the goalposts now.