I've some time, so I'll argue over the point with you. Thank you for this discourse.
Perhaps we should agree on what a master race would be, I would contend that a master race would be a race of people whom are objectively superior to other races. This should suffice to be called a master race, however not a perfect race.
Thus I would argue: If a race were to be the master race, would it be infallible, and thus impervious of falling for traps? No, hence we are in the situation we are now.
It is borderline an equivocation fallacy to argue that others have stated something and it therefore applies to my argument.
I've some time, so I'll argue over the point with you. Thank you for this discourse.
Perhaps we should agree on what a master race would be, I would contend that a master race would be a race of people whom are objectively superior to other races. This should suffice to be called a master race, however not a perfect race.
Thus I would argue: If a race were to be the master race, would it be infallible, and thus impervious of falling for traps? No, hence we are in the situation we are now.
It is borderline an equivocation fallacy to argue that others have stated something and it therefore applies to my argument.
(post is archived)