WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

The problem with this text is that the word "Jew" never existed prior to the 16th Century and is derived from Yiddish. The Jews are not Israelites.

"Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an 'Israelite' or a 'Hebrew'". -- 1980 Jewish Almanac, 1st chapter "Identity Crisis".

"Jews began in the 19th century to call themselves Hebrews and Israelites in 1860". – Encyclopedia Judaica 1971 Vol 10:23.

"Edom is in modern Jewry" -- The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, Page 41

[–] 1 pt

Does not matter what they were called back then, they were still the same jews back then as they are today. We can see the same typical jewish M.O at play here. Hebrews, Israelites, jews, whatever name you want to attach to them, they are all JEWS and they are all SCUM.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Did you read anything I posted or do you lack simple understanding. The Jews are not Israelites or is their Talmud based on Israelite scripture. In fact, it is diametrically opposite of it. Wake up. In fact,

The 12 tribes of Israel were racially different than modern day Jews. Archeologists use cranial shape and capacity to determine the race of any historic people. It never changes in time.

The remains of ancient Israelites skulls have shown they were dolichocephalic (long-headed) with avg. cranial capacity of 1416cc. This is identical to modern northern Europeans.

Modern day Jews are brachycephalic (round-headed) with an avg. cranial capacity of 1266cc. This fact alone convincingly proves modern Jews are not descendants of ancient Israel. (Jewish Encyclopedia IV, 1902, p 335).

Dr. Fishberg presented a table of nearly 3,000 Jewish heads, from various countries, measured during the last twenty years. He commented on the data, “On an examination of the figures in this table a remarkable uniformity of the cephalic index of the modern Jews will be noticed… nearly 90% are between 81.5 and 83…. Another remarkable fact is the striking absence of the dolichocephalic type, which is characteristic of all the other modern Semitic races” (Jew. Enc. IV, 1902, p 334).

Jesus was most certainly a descendant of ancient Israelites. His lineage is well documented.

[–] -1 pt

Listen, i don't give a shit about how racially different they were back then and what term they used to call the jews back then, to me the ancient Israelites were as jewish in behaviour as they are today and the Old Testament among with many, many historical documents is enough to prove that. The term 'the eternal jew' exists for a reason, they've never changed in behavior, always remained the same, only their tactics vary from time to time but at core, they always use the same M.O.

Also we know that jews scattered around the world after 70 C.E and they've heavily been mixed with different groups of people because they are parasites and need to blend in to make it easier for them to exploit the country they reside in, so jews today certainly have ties to the ancient Israelites even though they might not be carbon copies of the ancient Israelities racially, however ideologically and religiously, it's the same bullshit, they desired to rule the world and steal the wealth of all the non-jews as much back then as they do today.

But let me guess, you are probably CI and you think that White people are the real descendents of the ancient Israelites right?

I do not understand why anyone would desire to have those nasty scoundrels as ancestors lol.

Also Jesus was as jewish as you can get so naturally he was a piece of garbage..

[–] 0 pt

I don't see how Jews were responsible for this. Can you clarify OP?

[–] 0 pt

Jews helped Cyrus take over Babylon.

Sounds like america in the old days, a bunch of whites mixing with each other.

[–] 0 pt

You're wrong, jews ARE the Babylonians. They carry the Babylonian Talmud

[–] 1 pt (edited )

No, jews are jews. Babylonians were victims of jewry and here you are blaming the victim.. Also the Talmud is a late-comer and is based on the Torah

[–] 0 pt

The claim that Judaism commemorates the Passover of the Old Testament is as nonsensical as the one that asserts that Judaism's "Noahide Laws" are based on Noah, the Biblical patriarch who is mocked and degraded in Orthodox Judaism.

Like the ersatz Talmudic Noah, the bogus rite in Judaism misnamed "Passover" is derived from the Talmud - using the Bible as a prop. Here below is information on Judaism's foundational Passover text. Surprise, surprise, it's not the Old Testament but rather the Haggadah, a thoroughly Talmudic work.

"Haggadah" means "telling." Its recitation kicks off the week-long festival of Passover. In the Diaspora, the Seder takes place on the first two nights of the festival, and the Haggadah serves as the manual.

The Haggadah doesn't tell the story of Exodus so much as it depicts 5 rabbinical sages exegetically parsing it via Deuteronomy. Rabbis Eliezer, Yehoshua, Elazar ben Azariah, Akiva, and Tarphon spice up the biblical tale of the flight from Egypt by arguing over the minutiae of the Passover rites, which were originally compiled in the Talmud, the Jewish book of religious laws. This occurred very roughly, in circa 200 CE, but one thing remains certain: the Talmud, and the Haggadah along with it, was a response to a catastrophe so great it threatened to destroy a people. The Talmud was compiled as a result of the absolute destruction of Herod’s temple, in which every stone was carried away leaving no trace of it’s existence.

In 66 CE, when the Roman general Vespasian swept into Jerusalem, Judaism was a cultic, oral religion, with Herod's massive temple as its lodestar. Everything happened in the temple complex. Four years later, Vespasian's son Titus razed it to the ground. "Where was God under the rubble?" wondered the Rabbis. "How to praise him now that the temple was gone?" The sages agreed: Jews would have to become a people of the book, or they would disappear. Hence, they were NOT a people of the book before this time.

[–] 0 pt

There are couple of verses addressing Babylon as a den of immorality and evil, so I guess what you're saying is that all this happened after the jews did they magic kikery to the Babylonians?

[–] 0 pt

Yes. And who would want to demonize the Babylonians considering (((who's))) temple they destroyed?

[–] 0 pt

Read The Great Jewish Masque. 1936

Www.historyreviewed.com has a copy.

Covers that time period well. Very insightful.