![We shouldn't have bothered [931x1109 - 316KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/KGkUJ3.jpg){kind=link}
Wouldn’t he have been kinder if he did?
Yes
Actually gassing the Jews would have been a kindness to the world. Butchering Anglo soldiers may have been better in the long run, but I would not necessarily call it "being good".
He didn't need to "butcher" the British Army. He could have forced their surrender.
He didn't need to "butcher" the British Army. He could have forced their surrender.
That's literally what he tried to do! Even the (((Hollywood))) film Dunkirk shows the Nazis dropping "please surrender" notes on the allied at Dunkirk.
They used that brief warning time to escape.
I said that, retard. Don’t try to contradict someone you agree with.
You're the one objecting although you perfectly understood what I damn meant with "evil".
If faced with two options one of them is the more moral of the two. If you are presented with only two options then one of them is the "good" choice morally no matter how unpleasant either of them is.
(post is archived)