i dont reject christ at all, i just have no idea what to believe. According to the OT, i am led to believe the entire OT is just one huge rant about how kikes are the scum of the earth. Literally god saves them how many times, and the kikes keep fucking it up. He even decides to go lenient on them, and they turn around and absolutely fuck him over. And then the NT is one big rationalization about how the OT was a big over exxagerated. And yet, isnt writing a new part of a bible considered an ultimate sin? So is the NT even valid if the OT explicitly forbids adding ride-ons to the bible?
The point and lesson of the Jews repeatedly rejecting and being disobedient is that it is emblematic of all mankind, we would all do the same.
It's not because they are 'jews' and are worse, from birth, than others, we are all sinners.
They though are more prominent and more guilty because they had received more light, and will receive a greater condemnation.
The OT was fulfilled in Christ, the sacrifices and ceremonies were all about Christ.
The NT doesn't contradict the OT other than illustrating that since man is sinful and a failure, righteousness and redemption (getting right with God, forgiveness of sin) can come only through another (Christ).
'Kikes' weren't 'kikes' until more modern times, when their evil rejection of their messiah only increased their wickedness. But the gospel, Christ, was sent first to them, to give them one last chance. Many Jews at that time believed on and accepted Christ and were saved.
If any today do the same they also will be saved.
When God became angry at his people, he allowed then to be ruled by foreigners.
Like today: God is angry because of our fucking up ... again, and so he has allowed the kikes to rule over us.
Agree yes.
(post is archived)