>The NT invalidates the OT, it's literally the entire point of Jesus.
Only the ceremonial law has been made moot, not the Torah.
>Their argument of Jews being chosen by God is as idiotic as worshipping Satan because Satan was once friends with God and had a 'promised' spot in heaven... except he then kind of betrayed God and was punished for it. Exactly like the Jews.
Except that the Jews, being humans and not angels (satan was an angel) are offered redemption if they will turn to their messiah Christ. Whether they do or not is another thing.
All sin is forgivable (except the 'sin against the holy ghost' which is controversial as to what and which it is).
Not being a smart ass this is just what the Reformers and other sound theologians held to.
Well, from what I understand the unforgivable sin is rejection of the holy spirit, in other words, rejection of Christ's offer of salvation.
Right, but as long as one is alive in this world, it's difficult (impossible) for mortal man to absolutely determine if one has rejected Christ to this degree, I mean that his rejection in time, is one that we can see will not change, we can't see..one maybe guilty of this but only God can see it, we mortals can only conclude that it 'appears' that a person is committing that particular sin, cause as long as there is life there is hope.
Something like that, I know I sound confusing. John Owen's work on this from the 1600s on 'apostacy' explains it well.
Jews and anyone rejecting Christ should be sternly warned that they are in danger of eternal damnation if they continue this till death.
i dont reject christ at all, i just have no idea what to believe. According to the OT, i am led to believe the entire OT is just one huge rant about how kikes are the scum of the earth. Literally god saves them how many times, and the kikes keep fucking it up. He even decides to go lenient on them, and they turn around and absolutely fuck him over. And then the NT is one big rationalization about how the OT was a big over exxagerated. And yet, isnt writing a new part of a bible considered an ultimate sin? So is the NT even valid if the OT explicitly forbids adding ride-ons to the bible?
Jews do reject Christ like it was stated before because if they didn't they wouldn't be Jews. Even the "Messianic Jews" if they were sincere they would be Christians.
and they killed jesus. they do not follow him. so you have no point at all. of course if they followed him it would be different.. but then they wouldn't be jews would they? they'd be christians so your comment is totally pointless.
I have no point at all because they killed Jesus?
I think that adds to my argument.
When two rabbis are kvetching in the park over stupid jew-shit, and one rabbi smacks the other, do you suck the circumsized cock of the rabbi who got smacked? Because that's what the (((Christians))) do.
Jesus was not Germanic. Who cares about squabbles between kikes?
Heil Odin!
Except that the Jews, being humans and not angels (satan was an angel) are offered redemption if they will turn to their messiah Christ.
I agree. The Jews should accept their (((Jew-Christ))) and Whites should remember the White-Gods of our ancestors.
Heil Odin!
Sounds good to me..
(post is archived)