Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

538

It must have something to do w rape but the fact that we have no go-to term and shared concept is probably keeping a Womens Studies professor employed.

Maybe "violated?" "Defiled?" Are therr women here yet to weigh in?

It must have something to do w rape but the fact that we have no go-to term and shared concept is probably keeping a Womens Studies professor employed. Maybe "violated?" "Defiled?" Are therr women here yet to weigh in?

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

Feminism.

[–] • 0 pt

So a woman who's proud to identify as a man's whatever and who in such identification does all kindsa ludicrous modifications to her appearance is NOT deprived of something inherently dignified in female nature?

[–] • 0 pt

Did you pay to learn to (((speak))) that way or is it inherent? So a dog is NOT a dog if the dog has shoes that are NOT dog shoes that would cause the dog to NOT walk like a dog would in nature?

[–] • 0 pt

The question is has a shod dog been decaninated

[–] • 2 pts

I believe the term is "Nancy Pelosi".

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Who cares?

Now where is my sammich, bitch?

[–] • 1 pt

For example in your attempt at humor you are (unknown word)ing women by implying their womanly dignity is shared w all subway wage workers which is gay.

[–] • 0 pt

Trivializing the category of womanhood isn't the same thing as indicating to a woman that she doesn't measure up to the picture of femininity.

When a woman emasculates a male, she isn't trivializing masculinity. She is telling him he doesn't match up categorically.

You could say that a man exogynates a woman when he does the same thing to her.

It's not a term I think will catch any time soon. I just prefer to say that you 'shame them'.

[–] • 0 pt

Oooh that's a good word we're over the target lol

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Who says I was kidding, bitch?

[–] • 0 pt

I was almost certain you were serious

[–] • 0 pt

Everyone w any impulse toward socializing, everyone w even a glimmer of gratitude in their being, everyone w even a fragment of sensation of compulsion to duty. Pretty universally important question

[–] • 0 pt

Basically, I think the closest translation would be when "their" man trades out for a younger woman. The main thing is it really can't happen to a woman until she is a certain age. It suddenly becomes a major concern for most women around 30.

[–] • 0 pt

Hmm ok worth considering.

Also me: "i need a young girlfriend."

[–] • 0 pt

lol, you can always get a younger woman. To paraphrase Patrice, when your woman is hassling you over nothing. You have to remind her that she's being stupid because right now there is an 18 yr old homeless girl out there somehwere.

[–] • 0 pt

She doesn't hassle me over nothing...

It's a whole vetting process tho, my gf now is 30 and that's pretty nice for me at 40. Childless 30 isn't really thst different than 22 but my memory is perhaps not so accurate.

Also gross i don't want to extort homeless women into letting me fuck them. Gross on like 3 levels

[–] • 0 pt

Defeminate

[–] • 1 pt

Im not really looking for the (summarily invented?) Word, as a concept, what's it mean to deprive a woman of her womanhood? What's that look like. Probably we'd all agree on what such deprivation looks like for men.

[–] • 0 pt

Whatever it is, the broads that emasculate men have already given up on feminity and womanhood, so there's not much else to strip away as far as dignity goes.

Gallows get the job done for communists of both genders, however.

[–] • 0 pt

I think most emasculation is done by men; it's a rare and precious and gifted and ferocious female specimen that can emasculate a man.