• The Russians claimed that the Germans destroyed the evidence of the furnaces/crematorium weeks after they had already retreated.
•Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Britain had also planned to invade Norway, Hitler invaded Norway to prevent Britain from getting a foot hold.
• The legal defence at the Nuhremberg trial was denied access to almost all documents, witnesses they requested. Was banned from bringing up the fact that the allies had perpetrated most of the crimes that they were charging the Germans with.
▪The bombing of London only came about as a retaliation of British planes carpet bombing German civilians.
• Many of the photos of supposed victims of the death camps are actually bodies from German towns piled high from the clean up of fire bombed cities. These images simply had the caption changed to suit the victors.
▪The SS camp officer from the movie Schindlers List was arrested by the SS for mistreatment of prisoners. Why would they care about mistreatment of prisoners if they were killing them all anyway?
• The supposed "gas chamber" had wooden doors and a gap underneath the door.
• There has never been a rational explanation as to how the gas chamber worked and operated. The story kept changing.1 story said slits in the roof were used to drop in zyklon b pellets. Aerial recon photos showed no slits or gaps on the roofs.
▪To burn that many bodies would take an insane amount of time. It would also require 24 hour burning and a ton of fuel. Presumably coal. Aerial recon taken multiple times over the years showed no smoke ever coming from the chimney. No stockpiles of coal. What sense would it be to use fuel badly needed for the war effort?
• No one is allowed to exhume any of the bodies nor use any kind of ground penetrating radar around auchwitz. You would think they would want to find all the dead and you would assume that their must be lots of pits for that many bodies or ash.
• The eye witness accounts talk about bizzare things out of pure fiction. Many of the authors of books made by holocaust survivors have since came out to say they made it up but it was important to keep the memory alive???
•The US army also used Zyklon B for delousing and much more efficient chemicals were available if the intent was to kill people.
• Auchwitz literally had a swimming pool, 2 post offices, a library, a choir a brothel and a massive kitchen. Their is letters from inmates describing going for swims and for relatives to send them items. Their was also a hospital where children were born. Their are letters from inmates describing treatments recieved at this hospital.
• The pictures of children in striped prisoner outfits was taken several days (maybe weeks) after the camp was liberated by the Russians. It is likely they used children from local villages to dress up and stage a propaganda photo. Unless they kept these children at the camp for days after it was liberated?
• The Russians continued to use the camp for many years after the war. Including housing german POW.
• The red cross had access to the camp and made a report in 1944 that never once mentioned gas chambers.
• One of the main documents during the Nuhremberg trial that claimed to show proof of the final solution was presented by the russians, the defence was not allowed to view the document. Historians since then have noted the document was not in keeping with other SS documents of the time. As they used a particular letter type or marking to denote SS documents that this did not have. (This one i need to go back and check i forget the exact document and what thr marking was, it was described in the book Nuhremberg the final battle)
Im also not sure about the US army using zyklon b that was something i had heard someone else saying. Hope this helps.
This is great, thank you!!
As i wrote in response to the message below, i am quite new to all this and much of this info came as a total shock to me as i had always assumed their was overwhelming evidence that events took place as we were told. I am really busy with work and studies at this time and don't have as much time to research this as well as i would like. I intend to revisit in some weeks time and add to the list as well as all references and links to what i've said so that its easy to verify.
I think its important what your doing, to have small(ish) bullet points that literally just describe the inconsistencies and facts of the official story that was written by the victors.
I also got the name of the book wrong, its "The last battle: by David Irving", its an eye opening read. you can download the whole book there. https://archive.org/details/IrvingDavidNurembergTheLastBattleEN1996553P./page/n5/mode/2up
I found this site to also be really interesting. https://carolynyeager.net/auschwitz-underground-guided-tour
“Their”, really? Nothing worse than an illiterate defense.
Apologies, i wrote this at 2am after a long day at work. I am relatively new to the topic and these were mostly things i was running off the top of my head that i could remember from the literature i had read. My spelling and grammar is not particularly great, it is something i should perhaps work on if i wish to be taken more seriously. I was just trying to help out with potential points to add to the list, you are as always perfectly free to offer contrary points or discuss inconsistencies in what i wrote or disagree with any/all of it.
Hey, your list was cool. I didn’t need to be a dick. 👌
(post is archived)