WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

182

What if we all agree to disagree?

What if we all accept property rights and the principle of non aggression? (Self defence meets these principles as it is not the initiation of force)

Governments break these principles and are a monopoly on the use force. They could be possibly peacefully dismantled via vote. I think there’s too many of us to otherwise immediately stop paying taxes and walk away from this

Privatise the courts for disputes and violations of these principles. Personally I wouldn’t want to pay a business to protect myself, my assets and my freedom to disagree that has an army unless it’s defending against a nation state.

I also think I would rather this business be invested in arbitration between private courts and overruling private courts to arbitrate disputes.

Alas, I wouldn’t have a clue how it would manifest as the market will change based on millions of individuals acting in their own self interest

It can work, we’re all being cowed.

What if they threw a government and nobody came?

The amount of wealth destroyed by the ignorance of these principles by the mafias we call governments is incomprehensible.

Practical Anarchy - Stefan Molyneux

fdrurl.com/papdf

Everyday anarchy

fdrurl.com/eapdf

Freedom and liberty.

What if we all agree to disagree? What if we all accept property rights and the principle of non aggression? (Self defence meets these principles as it is not the initiation of force) Governments break these principles and are a monopoly on the use force. They could be possibly peacefully dismantled via vote. I think there’s too many of us to otherwise immediately stop paying taxes and walk away from this Privatise the courts for disputes and violations of these principles. Personally I wouldn’t want to pay a business to protect myself, my assets and my freedom to disagree that has an army unless it’s defending against a nation state. I also think I would rather this business be invested in arbitration between private courts and overruling private courts to arbitrate disputes. Alas, I wouldn’t have a clue how it would manifest as the market will change based on millions of individuals acting in their own self interest It can work, we’re all being cowed. What if they threw a government and nobody came? The amount of wealth destroyed by the ignorance of these principles by the mafias we call governments is incomprehensible. Practical Anarchy - Stefan Molyneux fdrurl.com/papdf Everyday anarchy fdrurl.com/eapdf Freedom and liberty.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

That sounds very nice, but I am afraid that you would choose incorrectly. Maybe someone could make better choices on your behalf and you can just follow the rules or get locked in a cage.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Kk sounds good

Group of people with guns that steal from me and make choices on my behalf definitely have my best interests at heart

Difference between rape and lovemaking is the knife to the throat

[+] [deleted] 1 pt

Liberal commies never agree to disagree. The only thing they like is when they force their beliefs down your throat.

What if we all accept property rights and the principle of non aggression?

They'll take everything you have without a fight.

[–] 1 pt

You’re initiating force so I’m allowed to use self defence

[–] 0 pt

No, I disagree with agreeing to disagreeing.

[–] 0 pt

Ok, are you going to be the one to come throw me in a cage for disagreeing with you?

[+] [deleted] 0 pt